@inproceedings{jiang2024convex,
author = {Jiang, Haotian and Lee, Yin Tat and Song, Zhao and Zhang, Lichen},
title = {Convex Minimization with Integer Minima in O(n^4) Time},
organization = {ACM-SIAM},
booktitle = {SODA 2024},
year = {2024},
month = {January},
abstract = {Given a convex function $f$ on $\mathbb[R]^n$ with an integer minimizer, we show how to find an exact minimizer of $f$ using $O(n^2 \log n)$ calls to a separation oracle and $O(n^4 \log n)$ time. The previous best polynomial time algorithm for this problem given in [Jiang, SODA 2021, JACM 2022] achieves $O(n^2\log\log n/\log n)$ oracle complexity. However, the overall runtime of Jiang's algorithm is at least $\widetilde[\Omega](n^8)$, due to expensive sub-routines such as the Lenstra-Lenstra-Lov\'asz (LLL) algorithm [Lenstra, Lenstra, Lov\'asz, Math. Ann. 1982] and random walk based cutting plane method [Bertsimas, Vempala, JACM 2004]. Our significant speedup is obtained by a nontrivial combination of a faster version of the LLL algorithm due to [Neumaier, Stehl\'e, ISSAC 2016] that gives similar guarantees, the volumetric center cutting plane method (CPM) by [Vaidya, FOCS 1989] and its fast implementation given in [Jiang, Lee, Song, Wong, STOC 2020].

For the special case of submodular function minimization (SFM), our result implies a strongly polynomial time algorithm for this problem using $O(n^3 \log n)$ calls to an evaluation oracle and $O(n^4 \log n)$ additional arithmetic operations. Both the oracle complexity and the number of arithmetic operations of our more general algorithm are better than the previous best-known runtime algorithms for this specific problem given in [Lee, Sidford, Wong, FOCS 2015] and [Dadush, V\'egh, Zambelli, SODA 2018, MOR 2021].},
url = {http://approjects.co.za/?big=en-us/research/publication/convex-minimization-with-integer-minima-in-on4-time/},
}