![\"figure1\"](\"https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/research\/uploads\/prod\/2017\/01\/figure1.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
This project sheds light on gaps and discrepancies between the experiences afforded by analog pens and their digital counterparts. Despite the long history (and recent renaissance) of digital pens, the literature still lacks a comprehensive survey of what types of marks people make and what motivates them to use ink\u2014both analog and digital\u2014in daily life. To capture the diversity of inking behaviors and tease out the unique affordances of pen-and-ink, we conducted a diary study with 26 participants from diverse backgrounds. From analysis of 493 diary-entries we identified 8 analog pen-and-ink activities, and 9 affordances of pens. We contextualized and contrasted these findings using a survey with 1,633 respondents and a follow-up diary study with 30 participants, observing digital pens. Our analysis reveals gaps and research opportunities based on pen affordances not yet fully explored in the literature.<\/p>\n
CHI 2017 publication (pdf)<\/a>\u00a0 slides of the CHI 2017 talk<\/a><\/p>\n Yann Riche, Nathalie Henry Riche, Ken Hinckley, Sarah Fuelling, Sarah Williams, Sheri Panabaker.\u00a0As We May Ink? Learning from Everyday Analog Pen Use to Improve Digital Ink Experiences<\/strong>. In\u00a0Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI 2017<\/em>, to appear.<\/p>\n Diary study on the use of Analog Pen: instructions<\/a>, full corpus of entries including codes <\/a><\/p>\n Diary study on the use of Digital Pen: instructions<\/a>, full corpus of entries including codes <\/a><\/p>\n Interactive view of diary entries (coming soon)<\/p>\nSupplementary Material<\/h2>\n