{"id":304376,"date":"2012-04-17T09:00:37","date_gmt":"2012-04-17T16:00:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/research\/?p=304376"},"modified":"2016-10-13T09:44:29","modified_gmt":"2016-10-13T16:44:29","slug":"bahl-achieves-alma-maters-distinction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/research\/blog\/bahl-achieves-alma-maters-distinction\/","title":{"rendered":"Bahl Achieves Alma Mater\u2019s Distinction"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Rob Knies, Managing Editor, Microsoft Research<\/em><\/p>\n Victor Bahl<\/p><\/div>\n In Boston on April 17, in the Great Room of the Massachusetts State House, <\/em>Victor Bahl<\/em><\/a>, director of <\/em>Microsoft Research Redmond<\/em><\/a>\u2019s <\/em>Mobile Computing Research Center<\/em> (MCRC), will be introduced as one of six recipients of the University of Massachusetts Amherst\u2019s 2012 Distinguished Alumni Awards. The awards are presented annually to those who have built on their university experience to attain notable achievements in the business, public, or community-service realms. Bahl, 47, earned the recognition with a superlative career that has featured a series of firsts in networking research, and on March 1, 2011, he was named head of the newly formed MCRC. He recently took time from his busy schedule to reflect on his career and his professional motivations.<\/em><\/p>\n Q: How does it feel to receive an award like this at this stage in your career?<\/strong><\/p>\n Bahl<\/strong>: It feels great! I\u2019m honored and humbled by the award\u2014and surprised.<\/p>\n This award holds particular significance. It\u2019s one thing to become an IEEE Fellow or an ACM Fellow, because the path to those is clearer: You have to have a certain amount of technical impact, but we train for that. This one is special\u2014it\u2019s not about technical accomplishments only, and it comes from an entire university with so many different fields.<\/p>\n While it\u2019s nice to get external accolades, though, it\u2019s a lot more important to me that I do things that have a big positive impact on my field and the company, especially in areas that require deep and innovative thinking.<\/p>\n Q: What were your initial goals for the MCRC? <\/strong><\/p>\n Bahl<\/strong>: Mobility and Windows Phone<\/a> is an area that requires focused thinking about how we\u2019re going to distinguish ourselves. The industry is big, things are evolving fast, and there is lots of money at stake.<\/p>\n When I thought about the mission for MCRC, the word \u201cindispensable\u201d came to mind. We had to invent technology that would become indispensable to people. I started thinking about fine-tuning some of the great ideas being pursued in our labs, getting them to a point where Windows Phone and Windows would productize them. The goal for MCRC researchers became \u201clet\u2019s not worry about publishing papers\u201d but instead \u201clet\u2019s focus on working with product groups and creating indispensable technology for our users.\u201d<\/p>\n The approach I took was to talk to our product groups to find out what problems they cared about most, then identify our existing research that addressed those problems, filling in the holes, and begin moving them into products. In parallel, we began pursuing a few blue-sky ideas that would move the dial in terms of how people think about Windows Phone and about Windows and Microsoft in general.<\/p>\n Q: Thirteen months after the debut of MCRC, how have you progressed? <\/strong><\/p>\n Bahl<\/strong>: Quite well. We are in the process of moving five solid pieces of technologies into the next version of Windows Phone. By all counts, that is a major success. We\u2019ve also initiated some bigger projects that, if they succeed, will generate lots of excitement and have a much wider impact.<\/p>\n I would give us high points in terms of succeeding in getting these technologies into the product.<\/p>\n Q: What is the technical vision that underpins the MCRC work? <\/strong><\/p>\n Bahl<\/strong>: One part has to do with marrying the cloud and mobile. The mobile cloud is not a new thing; we started working on it many years ago. But today, the whole world talks about it.<\/p>\n People and companies think about the mobile cloud in two ways: They think about it as a storage place that enables you to access your data from any device. And they think of it as mega-services such as Bing (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a> or Exchange (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a>, which require thousands of people and millions of dollars to build and operate.<\/p>\n I believe the way things are going to evolve\u2014and Microsoft is well positioned for this\u2014is that there will be a library of cloud services that are available to developers, who will tie them together in creative ways to offer major new functionality to users.<\/p>\n Most people already understand what an app store is, so think of this as a \u201cservice store\u201d for software developers. These services will be built from sophisticated computer-science algorithms that are both resource- and data-intensive. The services will run in the cloud for the benefit of mobile devices. A service-composition framework would make it quick and easy for developers to stitch these services together and build the next generation of amazing applications. You can be creative in how you use stitch these services together.<\/p>\n Microsoft has been a phenomenal company in helping developers, and this is a great development story for them. Now, you can build extremely powerful applications, using services such as optical character recognition, speech recognition, object recognition, trajectory prediction, big-data analytics, heavy-duty graphics rendering, and gesture recognition.<\/p>\n We\u2019re also looking at how to partition computations dynamically between the cloud and the mobile devices. When the cloud is available, mobile applications should opportunistically use it for computation. Certain portions of the application will run on the mobile devices, but other computationally intensive parts will be run in the cloud. All this will happen seamlessly without the user knowing about it.<\/p>\n Effectively, we want to use the cloud to remove all resource constraints that prevent us from building super, amazing mobile apps that are able to enhance our cognitive abilities. We have a number of projects in that space, and we\u2019re making pretty serious headway. More than 60 universities have been using Project Hawaii<\/a>, and our plan is to make these services available to the worldwide developer community. Then, consumers will start to see the power we\u2019re talking about.<\/p>\n A final part of the mobile-plus-cloud vision is that everyone on this planet will have Internet connectivity. We have been working diligently for many years to make inexpensive, ubiquitous Internet connectivity a reality. We have developed technologies such Wi-Fi hotspots, mesh networking, and, recently, white-space networking, all of which are aimed at bringing Internet connectivity to everyone.<\/p>\n Q: How did you end up at Microsoft?<\/strong><\/p>\n Bahl<\/strong>: I joined Digital Equipment Corp. in 1988. It was a fantastic company. I really liked it, and I was lucky in that I got to work with some really smart people. Everybody around me had a Ph.D. at the time, but I didn\u2019t. I\u2019d always wanted a Ph.D., and being in a research group made it even more important.<\/p>\n Digital had a program that allowed me to pursue my Ph.D. full-time for two years with full tuition reimbursement, full salary, and perks. I was the only one selected for this program from a large organization, more than 120,000 employees at the time. It was a highly competitive and prestigious program.<\/p>\n After getting my Ph.D., I wanted to do more challenging work, and I was finding it hard to find that at Digital, because in \u201997, the company was in uncertain times. So I started thinking about other places.<\/p>\n My brother was with Microsoft at the time. He said: \u201cYou should come and visit. At least, you can see your niece.\u201d So I came and interviewed with Rich Draves<\/a> and Rick Rashid<\/a>, who at that time was heading the Operating Systems group. Rich and Rick told me that we were going to create a lab that would be better than Bell Labs, which was considered the best research lab in the world when I was growing up. Everything they said to me was just right, so I took a risk. I had several other offers at the time, but I decided to come here.<\/p>\n When I came, I was going to work in networking, and I told them, \u201cWell, our group name has to change, because I\u2019m doing networking; I don\u2019t do operating systems per se.\u201d I suggested, \u201cLet\u2019s call it Networking and Systems.\u201d But there were five of them and there was one of me (laughter<\/em>), so we ended up calling it Systems and Networking.<\/p>\n I found Microsoft Research to be an amazing place. Its managers had the confidence and foresight to let people be what they can be. I didn\u2019t feel there were any barriers. I was only limited by my own imagination, my own hard work, and my own creativity. I received tremendous support and was able to build one of the best networking groups in the world.<\/p>\n Q: Let\u2019s talk about some of your significant successes, such as making Wi-Fi publicly accessible. <\/strong><\/p>\n Bahl<\/strong>: My first piece of work when I came to Microsoft Research was to bring wireless networking to Microsoft. When I got here, Wi-Fi was not popular. In fact, there was no Wi-Fi in Microsoft or in Microsoft Research.<\/p>\n My first objective was to deploy Wi-Fi throughout Microsoft Research. I did that. I was the first person to bring Wi-Fi into Microsoft Research, and it was so successful that Bill Gates (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a> decided we were going to invest in it, and the Microsoft IT department rolled it out to the rest of the company.<\/p>\n The second thing I did was talk to the Windows<\/a> team about changing the programming abstractions for wireless cards. I explained to them that wireless is not like Ethernet networks, for multiple reasons, and hence must be treated differently. They were not convinced that the difference was large enough to change the abstraction and add new APIs, so I decided to build an indoor location system called RADAR<\/a>. GPS doesn\u2019t work indoors, and I wanted to show that if you abstract the wireless-network card out differently, you can get signal strengths, and when you get signal strengths, you can find patterns, and from the patterns, you can find where somebody\u2019s located. RADAR became a groundbreaking technology.<\/p>\n My next big project was wireless hot spots. I used to argue that cellular bandwidth was going to become scarce so we needed an alternative wireless-connectivity solution. A majority of people spent most of their time indoors, so therefore, enabling wireless-LAN connectivity in public spaces was the way to go. But there were lots of skeptics, and people were gung ho for the emerging 3G networks. They thought that 3G networks were going to solve everybody\u2019s connectivity problems, offering high-bandwidth data connectivity everywhere.<\/p>\n I was adamant that Wi-Fi would enable the same access, so I decided to build the first public Wi-Fi hot-spot network in the world. I deployed it in 1999 in Crossroads Shopping Center in Bellevue, Wash.<\/p>\n When you reflect back and look at the success of public Wi-Fi hotspots, it sounds crazy that anyone would argue against them, but they did. I realized that it was going to be big, and now they are everywhere\u2014I feel pretty good about that.<\/p>\n