{"id":370100,"date":"2017-03-13T09:00:35","date_gmt":"2017-03-13T16:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/research\/?p=370100"},"modified":"2017-05-17T15:07:07","modified_gmt":"2017-05-17T22:07:07","slug":"democratizing-ai-improve-citizen-health","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/research\/blog\/democratizing-ai-improve-citizen-health\/","title":{"rendered":"Democratizing AI to improve citizen health"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Kenji Takeda<\/em> (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a>, Director, Azure for Research<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Doctors make life-saving \u2014 and life-changing \u2014 decisions every day. But how do they know that they are making the best decisions? Can artificial intelligence (AI) help?<\/p>\n

\u201cBefore evidence-based medicine, decision-making in health care was heavily reliant on the expertise and knowledge of the health professional, usually a doctor. What has happened in the last 20, 30 years is that the health care literature has exploded way beyond what any individual doctor could hope to keep up with,\u201d explained David Tovey, editor-in-chief at Cochrane. Cochrane (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a> is a not-for-profit organization that creates, publishes and maintains systematic reviews of health care interventions, with more than 37,000 contributors working in 130 countries.<\/p>\n

The goal is to analyze the latest medical research to find the best treatments and interventions for patients and citizens. Systematic reviews bring together the best available research evidence from individual clinical trials and study data from around the world to inform the development of guidelines, individual practice decisions and national-scale health policymaking. These are rigorous and robust studies needed to provide the best advice, but they can take more than a year or two to complete. Tovey is concerned that systematic reviews, which are a painstaking process, are not used as widely as necessary. Said Tovey, \u201cThis is one of the main limitations for using systematic reviews to guide decision-making, particularly in policy areas. Policymakers increasingly want their decisions to be made in a period of weeks or months.\u201d<\/p>\n