{"id":948789,"date":"2023-06-16T13:30:00","date_gmt":"2023-06-16T20:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/research\/?p=948789"},"modified":"2023-06-16T13:35:16","modified_gmt":"2023-06-16T20:35:16","slug":"improving-subseasonal-forecasting-with-machine-learning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/research\/blog\/improving-subseasonal-forecasting-with-machine-learning\/","title":{"rendered":"Improving Subseasonal Forecasting with Machine Learning"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
This content was previously published by Nature Portfolio and Springer Nature Communities (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a><\/em> on Nature Portfolio Earth and Environment Community (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Improving our ability to forecast the weather and climate is of interest to all sectors of the economy and to government agencies from the local to the national level. Weather forecasts zero to ten days ahead and climate forecasts seasons to decades ahead are currently used operationally in decision-making, and the accuracy and reliability of these forecasts has improved consistently in recent decades (Troccoli, 2010). However, many critical applications \u2013 including water allocation, wildfire management, and drought and flood mitigation \u2013 require subseasonal forecasts with lead times in between these two extremes (Merryfield et al., 2020; White et al., 2017).<\/p>\n\n\n\n While short-term forecasting accuracy is largely sustained by physics-based dynamical models, these deterministic methods have limited subseasonal accuracy due to chaos (Lorenz, 1963). Indeed, subseasonal forecasting has long been considered a \u201cpredictability desert\u201d<\/em> due to its complex dependence on both local weather and global climate variables (Vitart et al., 2012). Recent studies (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a>, however, have highlighted important sources of predictability on subseasonal timescales, and the focus of several recent large-scale research efforts has been to advance the subseasonal capabilities of operational physics-based models (Vitart et al., 2017; Pegion et al., 2019; Lang et al., 2020). Our team has undertaken a parallel effort to demonstrate the value of machine learning methods in improving subseasonal forecasting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To improve the accuracy of subseasonal forecasts, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) launched the Subseasonal Climate Forecast Rodeo (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a>, a yearlong real-time forecasting challenge in which participants aimed to skillfully predict temperature and precipitation in the western U.S. two-to-four weeks and four-to-six weeks in advance. Our team developed a machine learning approach to the Rodeo and a SubseasonalRodeo dataset (opens in new tab)<\/span><\/a> for training and evaluating subseasonal forecasting systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe Subseasonal Climate Forecast Rodeo<\/h2>\n\n\n\n