At first glance, helping sellers improve the way they work looks like a data challenge because we tend to believe more data equals better decisions. However, when we explored how they use data to prepare for customer meetings and internal business reviews, we saw a different pattern.

The amount of data they had available to them had increased—but so had the manual effort needed to turn it into useful and actionable insights. In fact, our sellers were spending more time looking for relevant information than they were spending engaging with customers to improve their experience.

As part of our Customer Zero approach at Microsoft, we apply our technologies internally and use that experience to understand what works at scale so we can pass that knowledge onto our customers. In this case, our discoveries unearthed a deeper issue with how our sellers interact with data in their day-to-day work.

Too much data, not enough insight

The increased amount of data available to our sellers gave them more options but also more information to process. It also introduced fragmentation.

“I think the big feedback pain point we got was that we have way more data than our sellers were used to. You give us a gigantic well of data, but how I use that data to execute my job is fragmented.”

Michael Toomey, revenue insights lead, Finance Data and Experience

A significant portion of our sellers’ time went into finding, interpreting, reconciling, and analyzing the information before any actual decisions or customer interactions were taking place. In some cases, sellers were navigating hundreds of reports and dashboards across multiple systems. In others, they were exporting data into spreadsheets, building their own analyses, and assembling presentations manually. They told us they were overwhelmed by the amount of data they had access to.

“I think the big feedback pain point we got was that we have way more data than our sellers were used to,” says Michael Toomey, a revenue insights lead on our Finance Data and Experience team. “You give us a gigantic well of data, but how I use that data to execute my job is fragmented.”

This tedious manual user experience didn’t match the fast pace of our work. Sellers needed to move quickly, and we needed a way to empower them to find the data and insights they needed to be able to make actionable decisions immediately.

Instead of continuing to expand the amount of data available to our sales force, we concentrated on making the existing data easier to access, understand, and use.

Beginning with a trusted data foundation

The starting point was the data itself. Our sales organization draws from many systems, each of which has its own structure, definitions, and refresh cycles. Without alignment across these systems, even seemingly simple seller questions could produce different answers depending on the data source. This created more work as our sellers hunted down which answer was the correct one.

We consolidated all this data into a unified model on Microsoft Fabric, creating a shared data foundation across the organization. It included standardized definitions, consistent metrics, and common hierarchies. Data from more than 70 systems was brought together into one governed environment.

This step required coordination across teams and ongoing attention to evolving data governance. It established trust in our data that made it easier to streamline the user experience for our sales teams down the line.

Streamlining how sellers work with data

With a consistent data foundation put into place, we turned our attention to how sellers could most effectively access and use the information.

Instead of asking sellers to navigate a portal of reports, we designed role-based dashboards that reflect how people actually work. Individual dashboards are curated based on role, workflow, and responsibilities, helping our sellers quickly find what they needed without searching across systems. We transformed the work surrounding actionable insights, too: Power BI surfaces intelligent insights to our sellers’ dashboards every morning, automatically giving them their priorities for the day and providing an overview of their funnel.

Before this transformation, building PowerPoint presentations for customers and summarizing reports were routine but tedious parts of the preparation process for our sellers before they spoke to customers. These preparatory steps have been streamlined or automated wherever possible, reducing seller time spent on repetitive manual tasks.

Empowering sellers using AI

With the data organized and cleaned and the user experience transformed, we introduced AI to overhaul how our sellers interact with the information available to them.

“A lot of what we’re trying to do is get to a native Microsoft 365 Copilot experience where we meet people where they’re working every day. And then work is optimized to be able to reason over our day to pull the data in.”

Michael Toomey, revenue insights lead, Finance Data and Experience 

To find the information they’re looking for, sellers can now ask questions in natural language and receive answers directly in the tools they already use. Insights powered by Power BI Copilot, Fabric, and AI Foundry are delivered proactively, helping sellers prioritize their day, generate summaries, and assemble materials for meetings without working through each step manually.

Insights that previously required a great deal of time to uncover are surfaced directly. The relevant reports are automatically routed to sellers based on their job description and client base. Sellers can also subscribe to continuously updated reports and have them surfaced each morning to their inbox.

These capabilities are available in the tools our people already use, which means they don’t have to spend time learning new product suites. The information they’re looking for can be surfaced through tools like email or within Microsoft Teams, which means sellers can stay focused on their work without needing to switch between systems.

Processes that once took hours can now be completed in minutes.

“A lot of what we’re trying to do is get to a native Microsoft 365 Copilot experience where we meet people where they’re working every day. And then work is optimized to be able to reason over our day to pull the data in,” Toomey says.

What changed

The most visible shift we’ve observed is how sellers spend their time. Less effort goes into finding, assembling, and reconciling information, and more attention is directed toward understanding customer needs and making decisions that actively move the business forward.

After deploying this model across our sales organization, we saw meaningful improvements in both efficiency and effectiveness, including:

• 100,000 seller hours saved annually
• 30% reduction in data ingestion costs
• 10x faster insight generation
• 1,500 reports retired and consolidated

We credit our success to building a trusted data foundation; a streamlined, intuitive user experience; and embedding AI into the flow of work to help our sellers surface insights and information with a few clicks instead of spending hours sifting through irrelevant inputs.

We learned that executive sponsorship and active change management were essential to transforming the department successfully. Concentrating on consistency and departmental alignment around a set of trusted, verified, well-governed data and shepherding people through shifting how they worked with the data were just as important as adding AI into the process.

Looking ahead

At the heart of our trusted data foundation is the semantic layer, the place where our business definitions, metrics, and data quality are standardized across the organization. It’s now the engine that powers our agents. Because those definitions live in one governed place, our agents can reason over our data products with confidence, and we can trust what they surface.

That foundation is already bearing fruit. A new generation of personal and role-based agents at Microsoft is taking on the workflows that were consuming our sellers’ time, such as meeting preparation, pipeline reviews, and customer insight generation. These processes are now running on the governed data infrastructure we built. Everything draws from the same source of truth, so everything our agents work with is consistent, reliable, and ready to act on.

This return on our platform investment is bringing us closer to becoming a Frontier Firm where our people spend less time searching for the answers and more time acting on them.

The post From data sprawl to AI-driven seller insights at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

Our Global Collection team in the Microsoft Treasury division makes sure payments are seamlessly executed in our fast-moving global enterprise environment. However, our case managers were often losing valuable time figuring out things like who the right contact was for a given customer, which issues were likely to be challenged by a customer, and where an exception should be routed next. This information was spread across systems or buried in handoffs.

To solve these challenges, our team built a human-led, AI agent-assisted support system to reduce preparation time and streamline their processes.

“Building the AI assistance wasn’t the hard part,” says Kathy Brustad, a director in the Global Treasury and Financial Services division at Microsoft. “The hard part was reimagining the collection experience with AI front and center, and bringing the underlying infrastructure up to speed to get it there.”

In this post, we explain how we did it so you can learn from our experience.

“We have over 1,000 collectors around the world who perform collections for Microsoft. They had multiple systems they had to go to in order to find out things like the totality of the customer’s invoice and what conversations a different team had with the customer. The information was fragmented.”

Kathy Brustad, director, Global Treasury and Financial Services

Stitching together information across systems

Our AI agent is focused on helping our case managers prioritize high-value work by:

• Predicting late payments and possible customer disputes
• Summarizing customer case interactions for use by case managers
• Routing customer emails to the right collections manager faster and with greater precision Automatically matching payments to invoices
• Automatically responding to customer inquiries

“We have over 1,000 collectors around the world who perform collections for Microsoft,” Brustad says. “They had multiple systems they had to go to in order to find out things like the totality of the customer’s invoice and what conversations a different team had with the customer. All of this information was fragmented. We didn’t have a single view of how much a customer owed us.”

We started by consolidating these dispersed tools and systems into an SAP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 environment, creating a single source of truth for all relevant customer, invoice, and payment data.

On that foundation, we layered on Microsoft’s IQ intelligence platform to infuse semantic understanding and business context. That standardized our workflows by simplifying templates and worklists to reduce complexity and put consistent global practices into place. Routine communications became fully automated.

We then applied AI to improve payment matching accuracy from 40% to 90%, generate customer response drafts, and intelligently route cases to reduce time-consuming back‑and‑forth.

Copilot assistance was embedded directly into the daily workflow of our case managers to reduce administrative load by providing inline knowledge suggestions, summarizing calls, and automatically drafting replies. With these standardized automated workflows, we could apply 98% of payments within 48 hours.

“In a nutshell, this is the collection story: We have various agents and models deployed to assist our human agents with all the activities they have to do, saving hundreds of thousands of hours that we spent on manually tracking things before.”

Kathy Brustad, director, Global Treasury and Financial Services

Moving faster on ‘act ready’ work

Deploying the agent was only the starting point. The harder work was helping our collection team change established ways of working. Brustad described the shift as learning to “run it in a different way,” moving from manual, fragmented preparation toward workflows where prioritization, context gathering, and routing were increasingly supported within the system.

To make that shift possible, the team introduced a change management work stream program and role-based training focused on real, day-to-day scenarios alongside the rollout. By anchoring the work in clear business pain points and showing tangible improvements, our team saw how the new approach made their work easier. Each morning, the agent prioritized each case manager’s workload according to urgency and past client behavior so case managers could immediately focus on the accounts that were the most pressing.

We reduced repetitive communications using automatically drafted responses and automated statements.

“In a nutshell, this is the collection story: We have various agents and models deployed to assist our human agents with all the activities they have to do, saving hundreds of thousands of hours that we spent on manually tracking things before,” Brustad says.

After deploying this system to our case managers, we saw measurable improvements in both productivity and speed, including:

• Hundreds of thousands of hours unlocked annually in order to do more human-led high-value work rather than routine administrative tasks
• 40% reduction in call preparation time
• 2X growth in automatic cash applications
• 2.5X acceleration of customer inquiry resolution time

Operationally, the team also saw up to 60% reduction in inquiry handling time through inline suggestions, summarized calls, and automatically drafted replies. To ensure these improvements were real and repeatable, we emphasized observability in our evaluation approach. Our team tracked dollars collected through collections and hours worked to create productivity metrics.

Data, trust, and good governance

When introducing AI systems or agents into finance workflows, leaders often ask two questions:

1. Can we trust the outputs?
2. Can we govern the process?

“The biggest takeaway is to know your own process very, very well. You need to understand where all the bottlenecks and pain points are. Start from there to design the new agent-enabled process instead of saying, ‘I’m going to just inject the agent into my existing process.’”

Kathy Brustad, director, Global Treasury and Financial Services

For us, trust came from getting the basics right in the form of right-sizing our enterprise data, standardizing our workflows, and establishing clear ownership for each part of the work. When we tested early and included frontline users throughout the process, outcomes improved.

“The biggest takeaway is to know your own process very, very well,” Brustad says. “You need to understand where all the bottlenecks and pain points are. Start from there to design the new agent-enabled process instead of saying, ‘I’m going to just inject the agent into my existing process.’”

Embed custom agent assistance directly into the moments where time disappears, such as prioritization, preparation, routing, and drafting so adoption feels natural and can be measured. You can prove impact with a small set of metrics like cycle time, throughput, dollars collected, and hours saved, and iterate from there.

Key takeaways

Modernizing collections is about fixing the fundamentals first, before you add AI into the mix. As you begin to streamline your own finance workflows, keep these lessons in mind:

• Fix fragmented workflows before adding intelligence: AI delivers the most value when it’s layered on top of standardized processes and a unified data foundation rather than disconnected systems and ad hoc handoffs.
• Embed assistance where time is actually lost: Copilot-style support works best when it shows up directly in prioritization, preparation, routing, and drafting to reduce friction without changing how people work.
• Focus AI on high‑ROI decisions, not just automation: Predicting late payments, flagging likely invoice disputes, and surfacing context can help teams spend time where it matters.
• Design around the practitioner’s day: When work arrives prioritized and prepped, case managers spend less time chasing context and more time resolving exceptions.
• Measure what matters to prove impact: Cycle time, dollars collected, throughput, and hours saved provide a clear, repeatable way to track productivity gains and cashflow velocity.
• Pair generative AI with strong governance: Trust comes from clear ownership, standardized workflows, quality data, and ongoing human oversight.

Editor’s notes:

• SAP is an enterprise finance system that many organizations use to manage invoices, payments, and financial records in a single, centralized platform.
• All metrics cited are based on Microsoft internal data gathered during the writing of this article. They’re best read as directional signals from that period, and they may change as systems, processes, and behaviors evolve. Microsoft makes no warranties, express, implied, or statutory.

Try it out

• Build and test an AI‑assisted workflow with Microsoft Copilot Studio to see how agents can help prioritize work, summarize context, and route cases more efficiently.
• Start a Dynamics 365 free trial.

Related links

• Discover the five lessons we learned on how to make AI stick for sellers during our Copilot rollout.
• See how we revamped and modernized our Microsoft Treasury infrastructure using Azure.
• Explore how we’re supercharging our support experience with Microsoft Dynamics 365 and AI.
• Learn how we’re transforming the marketing function at Microsoft with AI.
• Read about our role as Customer Zero in an AI-powered world.
• Check out how we’re measuring the impact of Microsoft 365 Copilot and AI internally.

The post Streamlining finance cash collection at Microsoft with AI appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

But in practice, the technical side of transformation is only part of the story. The missing piece is us humans.

When we encounter these kinds of challenges internally at Microsoft, we think of ourselves as “Customer Zero.” We roll out our technology across our own organization first, learning what works and what doesn’t in real time and at scale so we can pass our lessons on to you.

“After an early wave of enthusiasm for Copilot, adoption declined. People questioned whether AI was relevant to their role, worried about what it might mean for their work, and disengaged when the change they experienced didn’t match the change they imagined.”

Daniel Bertrand, senior director, AI Transformation Office

We learned valuable lessons about AI adoption and sustainable change when we deployed Microsoft 365 Copilot across our Microsoft Commercial organization, one of the company’s largest sales and service organizations. What we observed led us to reset our strategy and build a more human-centered process for deploying and driving adoption of our AI technology.

Driving AI adoption with role relevance and daily habits

Here on the Customer Zero team in Microsoft Customer and Partner Solutions (MCAPS), our 60,000-employee strong sales organization, we saw that getting access to Copilot didn’t automatically result in widespread AI adoption.

“After an early wave of enthusiasm for Copilot, adoption declined,” says Daniel Bertrand, a senior director on the AI Transformation Office team in MCAPS. “People questioned whether AI was relevant to their role, worried about what it might mean for their work, and disengaged when the change they experienced didn’t match the change they imagined.”

Initially, people used Copilot like a search engine and expected it to make work go away. When that didn’t happen automatically, they didn’t know how to approach prompting the AI, or how to create value with it. The gap between access and know‑how is where adoption slowed.

“I knew from experience that people prefer to hear from—and learn alongside—those closest to their day-to-day work, to build trust and confidence.”

Susan Neece Robien, senior director of adoption and change, AI Transformation Office

We reframed the problem from “How do we scale the technology?” to, “What does this change feel like for people doing the work every day?”

By talking to people in our larger organization about why they were reluctant to work with Copilot, we discovered the adoption barrier was less about the technology being available and more about whether people trusted it, understood how it fit their role, and felt confident enough to build new habits around it.

The ‘Adoption-in-a-Box’ approach

After these conversations, we changed our strategy across the board.

“I knew from experience that people prefer to hear from—and learn alongside—those closest to their day‑to‑day work, to build trust and confidence,” says Susan Neece Robien, a senior director of adoption and change on the AI Transformation Office team. “That led me to conceptualize Adoption‑in‑a‑Box—a repeatable approach that combines behavior‑change guidance, peer influence, habit‑forming activities, and light gamification so people can experiment with AI in a non‑threatening way and build confidence over time.”

We rolled out the Adoption-in-a-Box concept across the team in the following ways:

• Emphasized visible leadership support: We circulated videos and “day in the life” PowerPoint 1-pagers of how our leaders were using Copilot.
• Formed a community of early adopters: They becamepeer champions for adoption, evangelizing best practices and leading workshops.
• Created a Role Hub: The hub contained practical, role-specific learning about how to use Copilot rather than doing high-level general trainings.
• Ran prompt campaigns: To get our team started with habitually using AI in their daily roles, we ran prompt campaigns to make prompt learning accessible and actionable.
• Created the Copilot Cup: We encouraged friendly competitions with leadership support. We also ran hackathons and prompt-based scavenger hunts to gamify learning about and using the AI for our team.
• Created ongoing measurement mechanisms: We stood up dashboards with monthly, weekly, and daily average usage reports. We also ran quarterly surveys to track sentiment around AI adoption on the team.

After our initial success with Adoption-in-a-Box, we scaled it to adoption leads, who brought the model to life within their teams.

When people feel safe in experimenting with AI and incorporating it into their day-to-day work, that’s when it provides real value for the organization and the individual. We’ve learned that sustainable, scalable AI transformation succeeds when we put people first.

Key takeaways

If you’re wondering how to encourage your own team to adopt new AI technology into their workflows, you can learn from our experience:

• Prioritize visible leadership participation. Leaders set the tone of any transformation, and AI adoption is no exception.
• Roll out for role relevance. Specificity is the key here: How does AI relate to each person’s individual role? If the tool provides value and saves time, people will incorporate it into their workflow.
• Establishing habits is crucial. Sustainable adoption means people use the tool on a daily basis in the natural flow of their work. Give them low-friction opportunities to learn the ropes.
• Encourage peer-to-peer experimentation. Early adopters can be a valuable resource for showing others the way. Lowering the stakes by having a peer guide employees in a workshop or one-on-one can take the pressure off as they experiment with the tech.

Try it out

Test drive an AI-assisted workflow of your own with Microsoft 365 Copilot to see how agentic AI can transform your team.

Related links

• Discover the five lessons we learned about how to make AI stick for sellers during our Copilot rollout.
• Check out our full guide describing how we deployed and drove adoption of Microsoft 365 Copilot across our global organization.
• Read about our internal change management strategy for Copilot and how it helps us drive the future of work.
• Learn how the creation of a Copilot Expo propelled AI usage at Microsoft.
• See our seven tips for driving Copilot adoption with a virtual skilling event.
• Discover how one Microsoft Digital employee powers her typical workday using Copilot.

The post Staying human: How we’re using AI to transform the sales experience at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

In 2026, we’re celebrating 25 years of SharePoint at Microsoft. Microsoft Digital, the company’s IT organization, is commemorating this anniversary by reflecting on the journey we’ve taken with the product over the last quarter-century.

In this article, we’ll share our journey as SharePoint’s Customer Zero and step through the lessons we’ve learned building and maintaining an IT stack in the age of agentic AI.

Why SharePoint?

In the early 2000s, we faced a technical challenge familiar to just about any organization: We had important documents and data scattered across siloed file shares, institutional knowledge hidden away in email attachments, and access challenges preventing different teams from collaborating across geographical borders and departmental boundaries.

SharePoint offered the solution to these challenges.

Its flexible, web-based platform gave us the ability to collaborate using shared sites, centralized document libraries, and widely accessible workspaces. The application also fundamentally reshaped our corporate communications and publishing capabilities, providing features that would power key internal portals like Microsoft Web (our longtime internal company homepage, often called MSW), HRWeb, and MS Library.

“At the time, because there were so few customers running SharePoint at scale, the product was in many ways directly built to meet our IT needs.”

Sam Crewdson, principal program manager, Microsoft Digital

The evolution of how we used SharePoint in Microsoft Digital can best be described in three phases:

1. Our on-premises expansion and optimization
2. Our migration to the cloud, self-service growth, and modernization
3. Our incorporation of agentic AI

On-premises expansion and growing pains

When we first adopted on-premises SharePoint at scale, it became indispensable almost immediately. Internal teams used SharePoint to replace their existing file shares, publish information internally, and create many custom workflows and applications tailored to their needs.

Our team at Microsoft Digital was responsible for deploying SharePoint on an enterprise scale. Because we were one of the first enterprise customers to fully use SharePoint’s capabilities, we worked closely with the SharePoint product team from the beginning of its existence as a company. This meant we played a sizable role in influencing what SharePoint ultimately became.

“At the time, because there were so few customers running SharePoint at scale, the product was in many ways directly built to meet our IT needs,” says Sam Crewdson, a principal program manager in Microsoft Digital. “A result of our being their first and best customer at the time was that the SharePoint team often built capabilities for us that no one else was asking for yet, such as specific portals features and supportability needs.”

Our initial adoption of SharePoint exposed some structural limitations and gaps. To meet the goals of our internal customers, we often relied on custom code, which made upgrades more difficult. And data governance and lifecycle management could be challenging, with our internal teams creating thousands of sites with little or no ownership tracking.

Using SharePoint in this way meant rapidly accumulating abandoned sites and outdated content. Trying to conduct even routine maintenance became difficult because there was no reliable way to contact site owners.

“Because of the initial difficulties, SharePoint was frustrating at first, especially for admins. But then I realized how important it was for our users—the product saved them so much time, and they were so happy that it was available. It was a complete 180-degree shift in my mindset towards SharePoint.”

Thomas Snyder, principal service engineer, Microsoft Digital

These challenges meant tensions often ran high for the IT team during the initial adoption phase. Tempers sometimes flared as we navigated this period in SharePoint’s evolution at Microsoft.

However, the time and effort we put into overcoming these growing pains—time and effort our customers didn’t have to invest themselves—made the frustrations well worth it.

“Because of the initial difficulties, SharePoint was frustrating at first, especially for admins,” says Thomas Snyder, a principal service engineer in Microsoft Digital. “But then I realized how important it was for our users—the product saved them so much time, and they were so happy that it was available. It was a complete 180-degree shift in my mindset towards SharePoint.”

Scalable self-service, effective governance, and the cloud

SharePoint’s role at Microsoft quickly expanded from a collaboration platform into a more powerful application where our teams could build workflows, forms, dashboards, and other solutions.

Thanks to a decision to enable SharePoint’s self-service site creation capabilities, our internal customers were able to use it to build the sites they needed without having to wait for us in IT. By removing the friction of having to work with IT, they innovated faster and built new capabilities on their own using SharePoint’s out-of-the-box technology.

However, this self-service power we gave to our users also drove some sprawl that we were not initially ready to manage. By the late 2000s, the information explosion that SharePoint sparked at the company was increasing our operational and governance burden. The rapid growth in sites delayed upgrades and introduced security and compliance issues stemming from a lack of clear ownership when site owners changed jobs or left the company.

As a result of this growth, we made the decision to invest heavily in building up our governance and lifecycle management for SharePoint. We prioritized defining clear ownership for all SharePoint sites, establishing best practices around data cleanup, and building the guardrails necessary to make widespread adoption and use more manageable.

Moving SharePoint to the cloud

Our cloud migration started in late 2010 and quickly became the driving force for us in IT. Rather than see the migration as a simple lift-and-shift activity, we took the opportunity to strategically reconfigure the architecture and customization level of our SharePoint instance.

This was a huge undertaking.

We had to think globally across all our sites in different regions and countries. The tooling suite for migration was immature at the time, meaning some of our portals and sites would require refactoring. We also had to contend with the constraints of varied and sometimes conflicting regional data residency requirements.

“It’s effectively filtering, so you don’t migrate everything. You’re cleaning your house before you move. You don’t move everything in your garage—you clean it out first. The easiest move is the one you don’t have to do.”

David Johnson, principal product manager architect, Microsoft Digital

Our approach to moving SharePoint to the cloud took several phases

First, early adopters who expressed active interest in migrating were provisioned the first sites in the cloud. By harnessing their enthusiasm for cloud services, we allowed them to self-migrate their own site content

Second, we did extensive analysis of all sites to establish actively used sites. Sites where we had no recent usage were backed up, stored offline, and deleted. If nobody screamed, we didn’t move them to the cloud.

Third, we moved the zero- and low-customization sites. These were sites using out-of-box features that had the highest likelihood of a successful migration

Finally, all we had left were the highly customized sites, which often used customization approaches which were not supported in the cloud. These we chose to manually rebuild and often to refactor as part of our migration approach.

While we were making these first-in-the-world migrations, we spent a lot of time with our SharePoint product team partners to learn how best to move sites and to document the approaches for the millions of sites that would follow. Sites which had high levels of customization or features that the cloud couldn’t support were instead rebuilt in the cloud environment from the ground up.

We treated our SharePoint cloud migration as an opportunity to take stock of what we had and decide what we didn’t want to bring with us into the new age of SharePoint at Microsoft. We cleaned our data and retired unused sites based on which content and functions employees told us they regularly used and relied on.

“It’s effectively filtering, so you don’t migrate everything. You’re cleaning your house before you move,” says David Johnson, a principal product manager architect in Microsoft Digital. “You don’t move everything in your garage—you clean it out first. The easiest move is the one you don’t have to do.”

Cloud migration also presented fresh governance challenges for our team. Governance practices had to be established for this new environment that would allow for effective self-service across multiple sites.

Building governance around lifecycle management, attestation, ownership policies, and guarding against oversharing required a significant amount of effort from the team, but it was necessary to ensure a smooth transition from an on-premises tool to the cloud.

Site modernization: Reducing the need for customization

Around 2016, SharePoint rolled out what came to be known as SharePoint Modern. This new version was a game changer for our major portals, as it reduced the need for heavy, developer-driven customization and replaced it with powerful out-of-the-box page creation capabilities, responsive design, and improved accessibility. The product also eventually added seamless built-in integration with solutions like Microsoft Teams and OneDrive.

Less custom code meant we could upgrade faster and dramatically lower our development, support, and maintenance costs. But the best part was the improved user experience and better navigability of the new version. Before this, our IT team fielded numerous questions about SharePoint on a weekly basis. The more intuitive, user-friendly experience of modern SharePoint reduced the volume of inquiries and service requests drastically. Our internal users were happier, and so were we.

SharePoint in the age of agentic AI

We see SharePoint as a key “knowledge platform” for AI. It’s a critical enterprise-scale repository for our documents and data and other information that we use to power our global enterprise.

“Security through obscurity is dead. It’s the double-edged sword of semantic search.”

Thomas Snyder, principal service engineer, Microsoft Digital

As such, it’s one of our key “knowledge platforms,” locations where we store the information that is the lifeblood of our enterprise. And as our enterprise-scale repository for documents, data, and other information used to run our global multinational, it has become the launching point for many of our AI-powered experiences.

AI is only as effective as the quality of the data it can access, which is why we’ve prioritized governance best practices as we make this transition. With these new tools, we’ve had to overcome new challenges.  For example, in the early days of AI, the discovery of previously well-buried personal data is becoming a common occurrence.

“Security through obscurity is dead,” Snyder says. “It’s the double-edged sword of semantic search.”

Prioritizing good governance helps ensure agentic AI only has access to the data it’s permitted to use, avoiding accidental oversharing and related hallucinations.

As an AI-driven Frontier Firm, we’re empowering our non-technical users and engineering and development teams alike to begin building custom AI agents to drive innovation at Microsoft. Our teams can now use agents in SharePoint for tasks like creating applications, knowledge depositories, and sites, saving huge amounts of time and effort.

Many of these agents will eventually be available in Azure DevOps and GitHub, so we’re focused on helping SharePoint site owners put the appropriate data ownership and permissions in place to effectively manage and govern the data for use by agentic AI.

After 25 years, SharePoint remains a core part of IT operations across Microsoft. We look forward to growing alongside it as it continues to evolve and improve.

Key takeaways

These insights can help you mature and transform how you use SharePoint at your company:

• Self-service and good governance go together. Without solid guardrails for your SharePoint instance, your organization could contend with information sprawl and internal friction between departments.
• Cloud migration is a golden opportunity. Before you migrate from on-premises IT to the cloud, take the time to clean your data to avoid carrying technical debt and outdated information into the future.
• Out-of-the-box capabilities are your friend. Customization is useful, but too much of it can be unwieldy and expensive to maintain.
• Make data hygiene a priority. Poorly governed data can undermine users’ trust in AI, expose sensitive information, and delay widespread adoption.

Try it out

Explore how Microsoft SharePoint can help your team collaborate more effectively and be ready for the agentic AI future.

Related links

• Read how we keep our content fresh, findable, and governed with AI-powered SharePoint at Microsoft.
• Learn about how we’re handling Microsoft 365 Copilot governance issues internally in this guide.
• Discover ways to use SharePoint agents to surface knowledge and improve how employees find answers.
• Explore how we’re supercharging SharePoint sites with Microsoft 365 Copilot.

The post 25 Years of SharePoint at Microsoft: Our lessons learned as Customer Zero appeared first on Inside Track Blog.