“The pace of AI innovation has far outstripped how people learn. The old model of static catalogs, fragmented experiences, and a mindset of ‘consume content and move on’ doesn’t work in this new world, where roles are evolving in real time and every employee is expected to be AI proficient.”

Kavitha Radhakrishnan, general manager, Global Skilling

At Microsoft, this shift exposed a critical gap for us. While access to learning content has expanded dramatically, clarity about how to build and maintain skills has not kept pace. Our IT professionals often know they need to build AI capabilities but struggle with where to start, how to prioritize, and how to align their growth with business outcomes.

This is where our Global Skilling team identified an opportunity.

“We started with a simple observation: The pace of AI innovation has far outstripped how people learn,” says Kavitha Radhakrishnan, a general manager in Global Skilling product development. “The old model of static catalogs, fragmented experiences, and a mindset of ‘consume content and move on’ doesn’t work in this new world, where roles are evolving in real time and every employee is expected to be AI proficient.”

This situation led to the development of a cutting-edge solution: The AI Skills Navigator.

Try it at your company

Start your journey with our AI Skills Navigator

From content overload to guided capability building

At its core, AI Skills Navigator represents a shift in how learning is designed. Instead of asking learners to navigate sprawling catalogs of courses, the platform is built to guide them through a purposeful journey tied to their role, their goals, and the demands of their organization.

“Traditional learning catalogs answer the question, ‘What can I learn?’” Radhakrishnan says. “AI Skills Navigator answers the question, ‘What do I need to learn next—and why does it matter?’”

For IT professionals, that difference is significant:

• Learning paths are aligned to real-world scenarios and roles
• Content is curated and structured rather than fragmented
• Progression moves from foundational understanding to applied capability
• Skills are validated through credentials that signal actual proficiency

This approach helps IT teams move beyond passive learning and toward what Microsoft describes as “active capability building at scale.”

How AI Skills Navigator works for IT professionals

AI Skills Navigator is designed to meet IT professionals where they are, whether they are building foundational understanding, creating agents, or deploying and managing AI-powered solutions in production.

The experience is anchored in four key principles:

1. Curated skilling playlists aligned to real roles. Learners engage with curated playlists mapped to their role and responsibilities. These playlists guide progression from foundational proficiency to deep expertise and leadership with AI.
2. Applied skills, not just content consumption. The platform emphasizes hands-on, lab-based experiences where learners build and demonstrate real capabilities. Applied Skills credentials validate what learners can do, not just what they have completed.
3. Multimodal learning in the flow of work. Content is delivered in formats that fit how professionals learn day to day, including interactive modules, video, and audio-first experiences like podcasts. This makes it easier to build skills without stepping out of the workflow.
4. Skills validation with organizational visibility. Progress and credentials give individuals a way to demonstrate expertise. At the same time, organizations gain visibility into skill development and readiness at scale.

Behind the scenes, the experience is designed to deliver personalization at scale.

“The most important architectural decision we made was treating personalization as a ‘data and signals problem’ before it became a model problem,” says Iliyas Chawdhary, a principal group software engineering manager in the Global Skilling product group. “We built AI Skills Navigator on a modular foundation: a unified content catalog, separate skills and roles taxonomy, an identity and profile layer, and a recommendation surface connected through well-defined contracts. That separation enables us to make updates without rewriting the experience.”

By separating content, roles, identity, and recommendations into modular components, the platform can continuously evolve as technologies and job expectations change.

“The most consistent feedback from IT practitioners is that they need to move quickly from understanding AI to actually operating it.”

Priya Vaidyanathan, director of product management, Global Skilling

A differentiated approach to AI skilling

While many platforms provide access to AI learning content, AI Skills Navigator is differentiated by how it connects learning to real-world outcomes.

“The most consistent feedback from IT practitioners is that they need to move quickly from understanding AI to actually operating it,” says Priya Vaidyanathan, director of product management for Global Skilling. “The focus on governance, security, and how to enable their organizations without slowing innovation is a key differentiator for us.”

AI Skills Navigator is different from other learning experiences in several other ways:

• Built around roles and tasks, not course catalogs. Content is organized into curated playlists aligned to roles and real work scenarios. Learners are not choosing from a library of courses; they are guided to build the specific skills needed to perform in their role, from first exposure to applied execution.
• Orchestrated by specialized agents, not a single recommendation engine. Multiple agents work together to create playlists, guide learning sessions, and ensure content quality. This allows the experience to adapt to the learner, while maintaining grounding in trusted, curated Microsoft content. The result is guidance that is both personalized and reliable.
• Designed to build capability over time, not deliver one-time learning. The platform is designed for repeat engagement. As learners return, recommendations evolve based on progress, feedback, and emerging skills; this enables continuous skill development rather than a one-time completion model.
• Embedded into how work happens, not separate from it. Integration with Microsoft 365 Copilot brings skilling into the tools professionals already use and learning happens alongside real tasks, making it easier to apply skills immediately instead of learning in isolation.

Turning learning into team capability

For organizations, one of the most powerful features of AI Skills Navigator is the ability to align teams around shared learning goals. Skilling playlists enable leaders to define capability journeys that map directly to business priorities.

Instead of assigning generic training, leaders can create structured paths that guide teams toward specific outcomes, like becoming AI literate, managing agents in the enterprise, or building expertise in agent development. This approach transforms learning from an individual activity into a shared experience.

For IT professionals, this means learning is no longer abstract—it becomes directly connected to their role, their team, and the transformation initiatives they support.

Building momentum with an AI Skills Fest

To accelerate skills development through a moment of shared learning, we’re hosting our second global AI Skills Fest initiative in June 2026. The annual event is designed to bring focus, energy, and community to the AI Skills Navigator experience.

AI Skills Fest brings together:

• A global audience of learners across different roles and skill levels
• Curated learning experiences aligned to real-world scenarios
• Opportunities to engage, practice, and validate new skills

The initiative builds on the success of last year, when we brought together more than 126,000 participants in a single day of learning to achieve a Guinness World Record for AI skilling participation. This milestone demonstrated both the demand for AI skills and the power of creating a shared learning moment at global scale.

In 2026, the focus is shifting from the record itself to sustaining long-term engagement. Our AI Skills Fest is designed to help learners discover the right entry points into AI Skills Navigator and build momentum that continues well beyond the event.

“We want learners to think of it less as a single event and more as a catalyst for ongoing skilling at scale,” Radhakrishnan says.

Bringing AI skilling directly to Inside Track

To make these learning opportunities even easier to discover, we’re taking the next step by integrating AI Skills Navigator content directly into the Inside Track experience. This integration will provide IT professionals with:

• Direct access to curated learning journeys, aligned to Inside Track content
• Seamless pathways from insight to action
• A clearer connection between Microsoft’s own transformation story and the skills required to replicate it

For our readers, this creates a new kind of experience. Instead of simply learning how Microsoft approaches AI, you’ll be able to immediately start building the skills needed to apply those insights at your own organizations.

Look for curated deep links from Inside Track stories into AI Skills Navigator starting in the second half of 2026. Additionally, we’ll be adding links to our site navigation and Careers page to make it simpler to help you discover and build role-specific AI skills.

“From an assistant, to a coach, to a learning companion—the endpoint doesn’t feel like a learning platform at all. It just makes you better at your job.”

Iliyas Chawdhary, principal group software engineering manager, Global Skilling

A new model for learning in the era of AI

AI is reshaping how organizations operate, how teams collaborate, and how work gets done. For IT professionals, staying relevant means continuously building new capabilities.

AI Skills Navigator represents our answer to that challenge. The initiative moves beyond static content to create a guided, adaptive, and integrated learning experience. AI Skills Navigator just feels different—and better—than other learning platforms.

“From an assistant, to a coach, to a learning companion—the endpoint doesn’t feel like a learning platform at all,” Chawdhary says. “It just makes you better at your job.”

The era of AI demands a new approach to learning, and that approach is built on a foundation of role clarity, relevance, and continuous growth.

Key takeaways

If you are thinking about promoting AI skilling among your own employees, keep the following in mind:

• Start your journey now. Explore the IT Professional playlist in AI Skills Navigator to identify the skills most relevant to your role.
• Align learning to outcomes. Don’t just take courses: Define the AI capabilities your role or team needs, then use structured playlists to guide progress.
• Make learning continuous. Plan for regular, incremental skilling rather than one-time training events to keep pace with AI innovation. The AI Skills Navigator playlists are constantly being updated to help you keep up with the pace of change.
• Leverage AI-powered guidance. Use AI-driven recommendations, playlists, and coaching experiences to accelerate learning and reduce time to value.

Try it out

Visit our AI Skills Navigator site to start your learning journey.

Related links

• Learn how we’re skilling up for the future of work at Microsoft with Agent Launchpad.
• Discover how we enabled meaningful AI adoption internally with a Microsoft 365 Copilot Expo.
• See how we drove Microsoft 365 Copilot adoption with a virtual skilling event.
• Find out what it’s like to work in Microsoft Digital in the era of AI.
• Explore the new age of AI-led engineering in IT at Microsoft.

The post Building AI skills for the future: How we’re reimagining learning with AI Skills Navigator appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

That’s why, as part of our broader approach to AI at Microsoft, we—Microsoft Digital, the company’s IT organization—are building a framework to measure the impact of the AI investments we’re making on behalf of the company.

“If we want to measure the business impact of AI, the conversation quickly moves toward identifying the agents or AI efforts that are driving the most value and satisfying business outcomes. We know that those conversations can be complex, so we use a value measurement framework to capture and assess the signals we have available.”

Don Campbell, principal group technical program manager, Microsoft Digital

Our framework is helping us move from AI enthusiasm to AI accountability. It creates a common way for us to talk about value across our different initiatives, teams, and business processes. It also helps us ask a harder, more specific question every time we assess the impact of AI at Microsoft Digital: If AI saves time, reduces costs, improves quality, or lowers risk, what changes are we making to take advantage of that?

We don’t have the full answer yet—we’re still improving the way we measure. Some of our signals are instrumented, some rely on strong hypotheses, and some need better telemetry. But we’re not waiting for perfect results to start learning.

“If we want to measure the business impact of AI, the conversation quickly moves toward identifying the agents or AI efforts that are driving the most value and satisfying business outcomes,” says Don Campbell, a principal group technical program manager in Microsoft Digital. “We know that those conversations can be complex, so we use a value measurement framework to capture and assess the signals we have available.”

Building a framework for AI business value

AI value doesn’t show up the same way everywhere. One investment we make might help employees complete a task faster, while another might improve quality, reduce risk, increase coverage, or lower operational costs. Some of that value can be measured directly, while in other cases it starts as a hypothesis that needs to be tested. That range is why we needed a common framework instead of a single metric.

Our value measurement framework helps our Microsoft Digital teams answer three basic questions before and after they build:

• What kind of value do we expect this AI investment to create?
• How will we measure that value?
• What will we do with what we learn?

We organize the answers to those questions around six value areas:

Revenue impact: How an AI investment contributes to our business growth, sales activity, customer targeting, or deal velocity.

Productivity and efficiency: How AI helps our people complete tasks faster, increase throughput, optimize processes, or automate work.

Security and risk management: How AI helps us identify, prevent, or manage security vulnerabilities, risk exposure, or Responsible AI compliance.

Employee and customer experience: How AI improves satisfaction, engagement, or the quality of a product or service experience.

Quality improvement: How AI improves deliverables, accuracy, confidence in outputs, or process quality.

Cost savings: How AI reduces our operational cost, improves our resource allocation, or helps us avoid future cost.

Our framework doesn’t require every AI investment that we make to create value in all six areas. In fact, that rarely occurs. A support automation scenario might focus primarily on productivity, employee experience, and cost avoidance. A security scenario might involve risk reduction, vulnerability coverage, or the ability to address more issues than a team could handle manually. A process quality scenario might relate to measures that are specific to a particular workflow and be harder to roll up into a single number.

“Measurement sources vary based upon the type of AI initiative. The six value areas give us a framework for measurement, but we need to observe and collect information where measurement starts to become practical. Teams need to understand the processes affected, including how long work takes, how many resources are involved, and what the workflow looks like before and after AI.”

David Laves, director business programs, Microsoft Digital

The framework creates consistency in how we talk about value, while giving teams room to measure what actually matters for their scenario. Some measures roll up easily, including cost savings, time savings, and certain risk measures. Others are more specific to the process being improved. Those measures still matter because they help business owners understand whether AI is changing the work in a meaningful way.

“Measurement sources vary based upon the type of AI initiative,” says David Laves, a director of business programs in Microsoft Digital. “The six value areas give us a framework for measurement, but we need observe and collect information where measurement starts to become practical. Teams need to understand the processes affected, including how long work takes, how many resources are involved, and what the workflow looks like before and after AI.”

Our framework also helps us make better investment decisions. Before we commit to an AI scenario, we can map the opportunity to the value areas that matter most, estimate the value we think it can create, and decide what needs to be measured. After implementation, we can compare results against the baseline, review the data with the right business and AI owners, and adjust the work based on what we’re seeing.

That last step is critical. Our framework creates a way for us to create an operating rhythm around AI value. It helps us take a promising scenario and prove its worth (or lack thereof) by establishing expected value, evaluating what is being measured, and deciding what to change because of the results.

It’s a continual evolution of business value measurement that prioritizes progress over perfection, and it’s helping ensure that our AI approach stays grounded in the outcomes that are most meaningful to our business.

Turning measurement into an operating rhythm

A framework only matters if teams use it to make decisions. For us, that means moving measurement out of one-off reporting and into a regular management cadence. We track our highest-business-value AI initiatives by priority and business function, then review the KPIs that show whether those investments are creating the value expected.

Some KPIs roll up cleanly. Our cost savings, time savings, and certain risk measures can be summarized across initiatives and discussed at a leadership level. Other KPIs stay closer to the individual scenario because they’re tied to a specific workflow, process, or business outcome. We need both. Our rollup metrics help our leaders see broad progress, while the scenario-level metrics help our teams understand what’s changing inside their work.

“We actually create monthly targets and end-of-year targets for every top AI-enabled initiative,” Campbell says. “Then we basically reiterate every single month with our leadership team to look at the value we’re driving and have conversations about it.”

That monthly rhythm helps us proactively manage AI value. If a measure is trending positively, we look at what’s working and where else the pattern might apply. If a measure is off track, teams can dig into the supporting data, review the assumptions, and decide whether they need to adjust the solution, the measurement, or the operating process around it.

This process supercharges prioritization. Our team here in Microsoft Digital has a large set of AI opportunities, and not every idea can move at the same pace. By mapping initiatives to value areas, estimating expected impact, and tracking results over time, we can have a more grounded conversation about where to invest, where to scale, and where to keep learning.

That discipline becomes more important as AI moves deeper into business processes. We don’t want teams to measure only adoption or usage if the real goal is a better business outcome. Usage matters, but it doesn’t tell the whole story. A tool can be used often and still fail to improve the process it was meant to change.

Applying the framework: Global Support

Consider the following example of applying the framework from our Global Support team. This team is currently examining how AI can help automate specific pieces of the ticket management process.

“In Global Support, the processes that often matter most from a value perspective are the ones with high repetition. If a process runs thousands of times a month and can operate autonomously, without human input, that’s where AI can deliver meaningful, measurable impact.”

David Finney, principal program manager, Microsoft Digital

As part of this effort, we examined a support process that depended on manual follow-up. In this process, after a Global Support team member marks an issue as resolved, the team waits for the user to confirm that the ticket can be closed. If the user doesn’t respond, the agent must follow up once a day for up to three days. After the third attempt, the agent simply closes the ticket.

This user flow gave us a practical way to test the value framework. It has repetition, because it runs often; it has autonomy potential, because the steps are deterministic and rule-driven; and it has a clear time-savings opportunity, because a human agent spends time checking the ticket, writing the follow-up, and sending the message. It also has a measurable implementation effort, because the data exists in the ticket process but the solution still needs to integrate with ServiceNow.

“In Global Support, the processes that often matter most from a value perspective are the ones with high repetition,” says David Finney, a principal program manager in Microsoft Digital. “If a process runs thousands of times a month and can operate autonomously, without human input, that’s where AI can deliver meaningful, measurable impact.”

Finney estimated that about 5,000 tickets a month execute this process. Because each ticket can require up to three follow-ups, that can create up to 15,000 manual email follow-ups a month. At about three minutes per follow-up, that’s roughly 750 hours of productivity spent on one small piece of the process each month.

The framework helps us look at that work through both value and effort. On the value side, we can evaluate repetition, autonomy potential, and time savings. On the effort side, we can assess whether the data exists, how complex the solution is, whether engineering work or system integration is required, and how long implementation may take.

“We started to evolve our conversation to, ‘So what?’” Campbell says. “You saved money, you saved hours. What did you do with it? Where did the actual business outcome sit?”

Don Campbell, principal group technical program manager, Microsoft Digital

That structure matters because a high-value opportunity still needs the right implementation path. In this case, the process is part of the ticket workflow, so the needed data exists. The complexity comes from integrating the automated agent with ServiceNow so it can interact with the ticket, check whether the user responded, send follow-ups, and resolve the ticket according to the defined process.

Instead of trying to automate all of support at once, the team identifies specific subprocesses where AI has a clear role and the value can be measured. “It’s taking a sort of bite-sized approach to AI rather than trying to solve for everything in one big go,” Finney says.

That’s the kind of practical example the framework is designed to surface. It helps us find work that’s frequent enough to matter, structured enough for automation, and measurable enough to prove whether the AI investment changed the process.

Moving from savings to reinvestment

Measuring value starts the next conversation. If an AI investment saves time, reduces cost, increases coverage, or improves quality, we need to know what happens next. The number is relevant, but the business outcome is more important.

“We started to evolve our conversation to, ‘So what?’” Campbell says. “You saved money, you saved hours. What did you do with it? Where did the actual business outcome sit?”

That’s the harder part of AI value measurement. A team might use AI to reduce time spent on repetitive work, but the real value depends on how that recovered capacity gets used. In some cases, the reinvestment path is clear. A team can point to more programs delivered, more backlog reduced, more issues reviewed, or faster service delivery.

In other cases, the value is harder to trace. Some AI improvements return small amounts of time to many employees. Those minutes matter, but it’s difficult to prove exactly where each person reinvested them.

We’re careful when it comes to measuring ROI. We know our leaders will ask for it, and it belongs in the broader value conversation. But we don’t want ROI at the center of the story before we have the right cost model, telemetry, and approved data to support it.

For now, we’re focused on the operating discipline: Define expected value, baseline the current state, instrument the AI-enabled process, track results, review the data, and act on what we learn. That discipline is teaching us a number of practical lessons:

• Measurement needs to be built into the design of the AI investment, not added after launch.
• Teams need a baseline for the current process, so they can compare it with the AI-enabled process.
• Teams need to pick measures that fit the scenario.
• Data must have clear ownership, because uncertain data weakens the conversation with business owners and leaders.

Consistency matters as much as the metric itself. When our teams review value on a regular rhythm, they can see trends, test assumptions, and adjust the solution or the process around it. Some measures will be mature, and others will be directional. Some will need better instrumentation. The point is to keep improving the quality of the measurement while keeping the conversation focused on business value.

We’re continuing to build our value measurement muscle across Microsoft Digital. We’re not looking for one perfect formula for every AI investment. Instead, we’re creating a repeatable way to define value, measure it, review it, and use it to guide our next action.

As our AI investments and overall strategy mature, that framework helps us stay honest about what we know, clear about what we still need to learn, and focused on the outcomes that AI is designed to improve.

Key takeaways

Here are five actions you can take to help measure the impact of AI investments at your organization, based on what we’ve learned in our own efforts:

• Start with business outcomes. Define the business result you want first, so you can measure whether the AI investment creates real value.
• Choose metrics that fit the scenario. Select measurement areas that match the workflow, such as time saved, cost reduced, quality improved, or risk lowered.
• Establish a baseline before launch. Capture current performance before implementation, which will enable you to compare results and show what changed.
• Review results on a regular rhythm. Check performance consistently with the relevant stakeholders so that you can spot trends and adjust quickly.
• Reinvest gains intentionally. Use the time, savings, or capacity that AI generates to deliver clear value and ROI, instead of treating efficiency as the final goal.

Try it out

Get started with Microsoft Agent 365.

Related links

• Learn how a data council is powering our unified data strategy at Microsoft.
• Discover how a Center of Excellence is powering the technical veracity of AI at Microsoft.
• Explore how we’re reshaping Microsoft with continuous improvement and AI.
• Find out why Responsible AI matters and how we’re infusing it into our internal AI projects at Microsoft
• Read about the enterprise tools and solutions at Microsoft AI.
• Check out more details about Responsible AI at Microsoft.
• Learn more about the opportunity for AI in the Microsoft 2026 Work Trend Index Annual Report.

The post Measuring the impact of our AI investments in IT at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

Our Global Collection team in the Microsoft Treasury division makes sure payments are seamlessly executed in our fast-moving global enterprise environment. However, our case managers were often losing valuable time figuring out things like who the right contact was for a given customer, which issues were likely to be challenged by a customer, and where an exception should be routed next. This information was spread across systems or buried in handoffs.

To solve these challenges, our team built a human-led, AI agent-assisted support system to reduce preparation time and streamline their processes.

“Building the AI assistance wasn’t the hard part,” says Kathy Brustad, a director in the Global Treasury and Financial Services division at Microsoft. “The hard part was reimagining the collection experience with AI front and center, and bringing the underlying infrastructure up to speed to get it there.”

In this post, we explain how we did it so you can learn from our experience.

“We have over 1,000 collectors around the world who perform collections for Microsoft. They had multiple systems they had to go to in order to find out things like the totality of the customer’s invoice and what conversations a different team had with the customer. The information was fragmented.”

Kathy Brustad, director, Global Treasury and Financial Services

Stitching together information across systems

Our AI agent is focused on helping our case managers prioritize high-value work by:

• Predicting late payments and possible customer disputes
• Summarizing customer case interactions for use by case managers
• Routing customer emails to the right collections manager faster and with greater precision Automatically matching payments to invoices
• Automatically responding to customer inquiries

“We have over 1,000 collectors around the world who perform collections for Microsoft,” Brustad says. “They had multiple systems they had to go to in order to find out things like the totality of the customer’s invoice and what conversations a different team had with the customer. All of this information was fragmented. We didn’t have a single view of how much a customer owed us.”

We started by consolidating these dispersed tools and systems into an SAP and Microsoft Dynamics 365 environment, creating a single source of truth for all relevant customer, invoice, and payment data.

On that foundation, we layered on Microsoft’s IQ intelligence platform to infuse semantic understanding and business context. That standardized our workflows by simplifying templates and worklists to reduce complexity and put consistent global practices into place. Routine communications became fully automated.

We then applied AI to improve payment matching accuracy from 40% to 90%, generate customer response drafts, and intelligently route cases to reduce time-consuming back‑and‑forth.

Copilot assistance was embedded directly into the daily workflow of our case managers to reduce administrative load by providing inline knowledge suggestions, summarizing calls, and automatically drafting replies. With these standardized automated workflows, we could apply 98% of payments within 48 hours.

“In a nutshell, this is the collection story: We have various agents and models deployed to assist our human agents with all the activities they have to do, saving hundreds of thousands of hours that we spent on manually tracking things before.”

Kathy Brustad, director, Global Treasury and Financial Services

Moving faster on ‘act ready’ work

Deploying the agent was only the starting point. The harder work was helping our collection team change established ways of working. Brustad described the shift as learning to “run it in a different way,” moving from manual, fragmented preparation toward workflows where prioritization, context gathering, and routing were increasingly supported within the system.

To make that shift possible, the team introduced a change management work stream program and role-based training focused on real, day-to-day scenarios alongside the rollout. By anchoring the work in clear business pain points and showing tangible improvements, our team saw how the new approach made their work easier. Each morning, the agent prioritized each case manager’s workload according to urgency and past client behavior so case managers could immediately focus on the accounts that were the most pressing.

We reduced repetitive communications using automatically drafted responses and automated statements.

“In a nutshell, this is the collection story: We have various agents and models deployed to assist our human agents with all the activities they have to do, saving hundreds of thousands of hours that we spent on manually tracking things before,” Brustad says.

After deploying this system to our case managers, we saw measurable improvements in both productivity and speed, including:

• Hundreds of thousands of hours unlocked annually in order to do more human-led high-value work rather than routine administrative tasks
• 40% reduction in call preparation time
• 2X growth in automatic cash applications
• 2.5X acceleration of customer inquiry resolution time

Operationally, the team also saw up to 60% reduction in inquiry handling time through inline suggestions, summarized calls, and automatically drafted replies. To ensure these improvements were real and repeatable, we emphasized observability in our evaluation approach. Our team tracked dollars collected through collections and hours worked to create productivity metrics.

Data, trust, and good governance

When introducing AI systems or agents into finance workflows, leaders often ask two questions:

1. Can we trust the outputs?
2. Can we govern the process?

“The biggest takeaway is to know your own process very, very well. You need to understand where all the bottlenecks and pain points are. Start from there to design the new agent-enabled process instead of saying, ‘I’m going to just inject the agent into my existing process.’”

Kathy Brustad, director, Global Treasury and Financial Services

For us, trust came from getting the basics right in the form of right-sizing our enterprise data, standardizing our workflows, and establishing clear ownership for each part of the work. When we tested early and included frontline users throughout the process, outcomes improved.

“The biggest takeaway is to know your own process very, very well,” Brustad says. “You need to understand where all the bottlenecks and pain points are. Start from there to design the new agent-enabled process instead of saying, ‘I’m going to just inject the agent into my existing process.’”

Embed custom agent assistance directly into the moments where time disappears, such as prioritization, preparation, routing, and drafting so adoption feels natural and can be measured. You can prove impact with a small set of metrics like cycle time, throughput, dollars collected, and hours saved, and iterate from there.

Key takeaways

Modernizing collections is about fixing the fundamentals first, before you add AI into the mix. As you begin to streamline your own finance workflows, keep these lessons in mind:

• Fix fragmented workflows before adding intelligence: AI delivers the most value when it’s layered on top of standardized processes and a unified data foundation rather than disconnected systems and ad hoc handoffs.
• Embed assistance where time is actually lost: Copilot-style support works best when it shows up directly in prioritization, preparation, routing, and drafting to reduce friction without changing how people work.
• Focus AI on high‑ROI decisions, not just automation: Predicting late payments, flagging likely invoice disputes, and surfacing context can help teams spend time where it matters.
• Design around the practitioner’s day: When work arrives prioritized and prepped, case managers spend less time chasing context and more time resolving exceptions.
• Measure what matters to prove impact: Cycle time, dollars collected, throughput, and hours saved provide a clear, repeatable way to track productivity gains and cashflow velocity.
• Pair generative AI with strong governance: Trust comes from clear ownership, standardized workflows, quality data, and ongoing human oversight.

Editor’s notes:

• SAP is an enterprise finance system that many organizations use to manage invoices, payments, and financial records in a single, centralized platform.
• All metrics cited are based on Microsoft internal data gathered during the writing of this article. They’re best read as directional signals from that period, and they may change as systems, processes, and behaviors evolve. Microsoft makes no warranties, express, implied, or statutory.

Try it out

• Build and test an AI‑assisted workflow with Microsoft Copilot Studio to see how agents can help prioritize work, summarize context, and route cases more efficiently.
• Start a Dynamics 365 free trial.

Related links

• Discover the five lessons we learned on how to make AI stick for sellers during our Copilot rollout.
• See how we revamped and modernized our Microsoft Treasury infrastructure using Azure.
• Explore how we’re supercharging our support experience with Microsoft Dynamics 365 and AI.
• Learn how we’re transforming the marketing function at Microsoft with AI.
• Read about our role as Customer Zero in an AI-powered world.
• Check out how we’re measuring the impact of Microsoft 365 Copilot and AI internally.

The post Streamlining finance cash collection at Microsoft with AI appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

As AI capabilities advanced, we saw an opportunity to move beyond individual productivity gains and toward something more transformative: Empowering our developers to build intelligent agents that can automate workflows, streamline operations, and create new business value.

Realizing this vision required more than new tools. We needed to rethink how we foster development, govern innovation, and operate at scale.

“We’ve made a lot of progress enabling our developers to build agents that make us more productive. We’re Customer Zero at Microsoft, which means we’re the first to deploy and use the technology and services that we later sell to our customers. Those learnings give us a unique perspective and story to share about the journey our developers have been on with AI and agents.”

Brian Fielder, vice president, Microsoft Digital

Today, we’re sharing the foundation we built that supports this shift.

We’re driving employees across Microsoft to create and use AI agents—from simple, task-focused solutions to enterprise-grade applications available across the company. It’s all supported by a secure, governed, and extensible platform.

“We’ve made a lot of progress enabling our developers to build agents that make us more productive,” says Brian Fielder, vice president of Microsoft Digital, the company’s IT organization. “We’re Customer Zero at Microsoft, which means we’re the first to deploy and use the technology and services that we later sell to our customers. Those learnings give us a unique perspective and story to share about the journey our developers have been on with AI and agents.”

Within the context of Microsoft Build 2026, we’re sharing what it really takes to move from experimentation to impact. Through this collection of stories and resources, we highlight how we’re empowering our developers to build with agentic AI—from establishing governance and platform capabilities to driving adoption and delivering real-world outcomes. Our goal is to provide practical insights you can use to accelerate your own AI journey.

“We hope you find the journey we’ve been on practical and useful,” Fielder says. “When it comes to agents, we’re accelerating fast and scaling at an enterprise level. As our story continues to evolve, we look forward to sharing it with you.”

Guidance for developers: How we manage agentic AI at Microsoft

These articles outline our vision for agentic AI, showing how we’re building a secure, governed, and extensible foundation for AI agents—from Work IQ and Copilot Studio to Agent 365, Azure DevOps, and Model Context Protocol—so developers can create scalable, high-value solutions across the enterprise.

April 16, 2026

Alex Fleck

Becoming a Frontier Firm: A guide for deploying AI agents based on our experience at Microsoft

May 21, 2026

Alex Fleck

Governing AI agents at scale: Lessons from our journey at Microsoft

• How Work IQ is supercharging our AI usage at Microsoft
• Shaping AI management at Microsoft with Agent 365 and Copilot controls
• Deploying Microsoft Agent 365: How we’re extending our infrastructure to manage agents at Microsoft
• Unlocking enterprise AI extensibility at Microsoft with Microsoft Copilot Studio
• Powering AI value with Microsoft 365 Copilot extensibility at Microsoft
• How our employees are extending enterprise AI with custom retrieval agents
• Transforming our approach to sensitivity labels at Microsoft with Microsoft Entra
• Reclaiming engineering time with AI in Azure DevOps at Microsoft
• Protecting AI conversations at Microsoft with Model Context Protocol security and governance

UPCOMING POSTS

• Intelligence on tap: Our guide for How Work IQ enables Microsoft 365 Copilot to better understand how we work at Microsoft
• Our guide for deploying Agent 365 based on our experience at Microsoft
• Agentic modernization: Securing Python at scale for agentic AI at Microsoft

Our IT guide to becoming a Frontier Firm

These stories share our IT playbook for becoming a Frontier Firm, highlighting a practical path to enterprise AI maturity through agentic transformation, operational scale, responsible innovation, and partnership—showing how IT leaders can balance governance, modernization, and employee engagement while building an AI-first organization.

December 4, 2025

Keith Boyd

Becoming a Frontier Firm: Our IT playbook for the AI era

• Enterprise AI maturity in five steps: Our guide for IT leaders
• The agentic future: How we’re becoming an AI-first Frontier Firm at Microsoft
• AI at scale: How we’re transforming our enterprise IT operations at Microsoft
• Transforming into an AI-first Frontier Firm in partnership with our works councils
• Fast Train to the AI Frontier: Balancing risk and innovation in the era of AI at Microsoft

Working as developer in IT at Microsoft in the era of AI

These stories explore what it means to work in Microsoft Digital during the AI era, showing how developers and knowledge workers are reshaping engineering, the employee experience, and their own career growth through AI-powered tools, new ways of working, and personal journeys that reflect the evolving culture of IT at Microsoft.

May 21, 2026

Matthew Cooke

IT on the cutting edge: Working in Microsoft Digital in the era of AI

• Powering the new age of AI-led engineering in IT at Microsoft – Inside Track Blog
• The Frontier Firm: How knowledge workers are forging their own AI tools at Microsoft – Inside Track Blog
• The future of work is here: Transforming our employee experience with AI – Inside Track Blog
• Olutunde Makinde: From Lagos to Redmond, a Microsoft IT engineer’s journey – Inside Track Blog
• Building from the inside: Anahit Hovhannisyan’s impact on IT at Microsoft – Inside Track Blog

Key takeaways

From our journey enabling agentic AI across Microsoft Digital, several key principles have emerged to help organizations move from experimentation to scalable, enterprise-wide impact.

• Treat your organization as Customer Zero. Use your own AI capabilities first to generate real-world insights, validate scenarios, and build credibility before scaling to customers.
• Build a foundation for scale. Establish a secure, governed, and extensible platform that enables developers to create AI agents—from simple solutions to enterprise-grade applications.
• Empower developers to drive transformation. Move beyond productivity gains by enabling developers to build intelligent agents that automate workflows and unlock new business value.
• Align governance with innovation. Rethink how you enable development, govern AI, and operate at scale to balance flexibility with responsible use.
• Connect tools, platforms, and workflows. Integrate AI capabilities across your ecosystem—linking platforms, governance models, and development tools to support consistent, scalable adoption.
• Translate experimentation into impact. Focus on turning early AI exploration into coordinated, enterprise-wide efforts that deliver measurable outcomes.

Try it out

Learn more about Microsoft Build.

Related links

• Read our guide for deploying AI agents based on our experience at Microsoft.
• Learn about how we’re governing AI agents at scale internally.
• Find out how Work IQ is supercharging our AI usage at Microsoft.
• Check out an IT playbook for the AI era and see how we’re becoming a Frontier Firm.

The post Microsoft Build 2026: Empowering our developers to adopt agentic AI at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

For years, our security groups operated without consistent, policy‑based guardrails. As a result, we couldn’t uniformly control guest access to sensitive resources or apply governance consistently across different group types.

Addressing this required a complex, coordinated effort by our team here in Microsoft Digital, the company’s IT organization, and the Microsoft Entra product team.

“Because IT security is our highest priority at Microsoft, we knew we needed a better approach to limiting access to groups within our tenant. And we realized that Microsoft Entra was a powerful in-house solution that represented our best path forward to solve for this challenge.”

David Johnson, principal product manager architect, Microsoft Digital

The result is a new approach to sensitivity labels across the organization that strengthens our security posture, which benefits Microsoft and our customers.

“Because IT security is our highest priority at Microsoft, we knew we needed a better approach to limiting access to groups within our tenant,” says David Johnson, a principal product manager architect in Microsoft Digital. “And we realized that Microsoft Entra was a powerful in-house solution that represented our best path forward to solve for this challenge.”

Go deeper

Learn how to assign sensitivity labels to Microsoft Entra security groups.

Closing the security gap

Sensitivity labels for Microsoft 365 groups are labels that govern join and access restrictions for membership and sharing. They have been a product feature since 2020. But sensitivity labels for security groups—labels that enforce rules about who can join a group—had no equivalent.

This meant that organizations that wanted to govern who could join a security group or determine if guests are permitted and how group membership is managed had to either lock down the group creation process entirely, or rely on reactive scanning after the fact.

“Security groups are a key piece of our efforts to secure sensitive resources,” says Mohit Bhargava, a principal product manager on the Microsoft Entra team, which manages the Entra family of identity and network access products. “We wanted to apply policies to protect who could be in security groups so that the sensitive resources in those groups would remain secure.”

“Whoever gets into an Azure security group can have access to all the resources associated with the Azure subscription. That’s a potential high-severity threat.”

Basanth Kakumani, software engineer II, Microsoft Digital

The security risk is real. If an unauthorized guest account ends up as a member of a security group that governs access to an Azure subscription, that guest gains access to every resource inside that subscription.

“Whoever gets into an Azure security group can have access to all the resources associated with the Azure subscription,” says Basanth Kakumani, a software engineer II in Microsoft Digital. “That’s a potential high-severity threat.”

Another priority was the need for consistency across experiences.

“Microsoft 365 groups have supported labeling for a very long time,” Bhargava says. “Customers have an expectation that there’s parity across group types, so that they can govern them uniformly. That was another driving factor for this work.”

Security groups reuse the same sensitivity labels already configured for Microsoft 365 groups and SharePoint sites in Microsoft Purview—so admins don’t need to create or manage a separate set of labels. This reuse reduces configuration overhead and supports a more consistent governance model across group types.

Security workarounds, and why they fell short

Without sensitivity label support, we had to make do with alternative solutions. The most common one was simply preventing certain users from creating any security groups at all.

In the Microsoft tenant, this meant that employees who needed a security group had to fill out a form that had custom business logic behind it.

“We had on-premises, Active Directory, synchronization, tooling, and customization,” Johnson says. “This caused latency, from the time you created your group to the time it would show cloud membership. If you wanted to manage your membership, you had to do it on premises, AD, and then wait for it to sync to Entra.”

Neither centralized control nor reactive governance was a satisfying solution to prevent policy violations.

“This is really about making reactive things more proactive. We want to catch problems before they occur.”

John Begley, principal software engineer, Microsoft Digital

Typically, IT is going to manage this in one of two ways: Either we turn off self-service and manage everything on behalf of users, or we do reactive governance, which includes scanning groups and looking for policy violations.

Those aren’t super effective at preempting violations.

“This is really about making reactive things more proactive,” says John Begley, a principal software engineer in Microsoft Digital. “We want to catch problems before they occur.”

A collaborative solution

Coming up with a solution to this challenge required a genuine partnership.

We at Microsoft Digital approached the Entra product team and explained the problem we were trying to solve. Rather than simply handling this as a feature request, the two teams agreed to a co-development arrangement.

“Having access to a very large customer who cares deeply about security was extremely helpful. If it works for Microsoft, which is so complicated and huge, it’s going to work for smaller-sized tenants too.”

Mohit Bhargava, principal product manager, Microsoft Entra

Microsoft Digital team members would work alongside Entra engineers as the feature was built, serving simultaneously as implementation partner, design critic, and test environment—what we like to call our Customer Zero role.

Bhargava found the partnership equally illuminating from the product side.

“Having access to a very large customer who cares deeply about security was extremely helpful,” he says. “If it works for Microsoft, which is so complicated and huge, it’s going to work for smaller-sized tenants too.”

For Begley and his team, working closely with the product team revealed how complex the solution actually was.

“Both the product team and Microsoft Digital walked into this thinking a fix was going to be simpler than what it turned out to be,” Begley says. “It’s been eye-opening to see how the product is built, how it runs, what all the moving parts are. We learned early on that there was significant co‑development happening within Entra itself, across teams with very different areas of expertise.”

That dynamic played out in specific feature decisions. The team’s original plan did not include support for agent access controls and didn’t include the ability to prevent AI agents from joining sensitive security groups. This is something the product group quickly addressed and resolved after our team in Microsoft Digital raised it as a concern.

“One of the first customers who raised it was Microsoft Digital,” Bhargava says. “They said we needed need to start thinking about it ahead of time to get ahead of the problem.”

Sensitivity labels for Microsoft Entra cloud security groups are now in public preview. The same labels you publish in Microsoft Purview for Microsoft 365 groups and sites now apply to Entra security groups. Visit Microsoft Learn for scope, supported scenarios, and current preview behaviors.

Changes afoot for IT admins and employees

The practical impact of this solution lands on both sides of the relationship between Microsoft Digital and the company’s employees.

“Now I can’t accidentally have guests in an internal-only group, which changes the dynamic. Employees can create their own Entra security groups now, without us having to worry that they’ll be inviting guests where they shouldn’t be.”

David Johnson, principal product manager architect, Microsoft Digital

For IT admins, the shift is from reactive remediation to proactive prevention. For employees, it means self-service action with security groups become viable again, without the security risks that made organizations reluctant to enable it before.

“Now I can’t accidentally have guests in an internal-only group, which changes the dynamic,” Johnson says. “Employees can create their own Entra security groups now, without us having to worry that they’ll be inviting guests where they shouldn’t be.”

Johnson underscores the broader ambition behind the shift, which is to allow employees to create and manage groups directly in Entra.

“A company that can unblock self-service action by its employees with confidence, knowing that there’s an additional level of protection—that’s very important,” he says.

Looking ahead: AI and the expanding policy surface

Labeling support for security groups is already being extended across the organization, with AI governance in mind.

Adding the ability to block agents from joining sensitive security groups is our next logical step. Guest membership is enforced via allow-to-add guest policy, but agents won’t join in the same way. Rather, we will set policies in Purview and then use labels to control if an agent can join a group.

The longer-term vision involves extending oversharing prevention beyond Entra itself. This will make it impossible (not just detectable) to accidentally assign a highly confidential resource to an unlabeled or inappropriately scoped security group. The foundation we’ve built with labeling in Entra is what makes this vital step possible.

“We want to get into the preventative aspect,” Johnson says. “The goal is to make it so it’s not possible to overshare in the first place.”

Key takeaways

Here are some tips as you consider ways to address how you manage your own security labeling practices:  

• Reuse existing labels—no extra setup required. Security groups reuse the same sensitivity labels already configured for Microsoft 365 Groups and SharePoint sites in Microsoft Purview, eliminating duplicate configuration and helping admins apply a consistent governance model across group types.
• Understand label immutability at launch. Unlike Microsoft 365 Groups, sensitivity labels on security groups are initially immutable—a deliberate design choice to ensure protections are enforced from the moment a group is created. Controlled label mutability will be introduced in a subsequent update.
• Know what’s in scope today. Labeling currently applies to static, non–mail-enabled security groups. Dynamic membership groups, mail-enabled security groups, and distribution lists aren’t supported at launch, so admins should plan accordingly.
• Shift from reactive cleanup to proactive protection. Label-driven membership controls prevent policy violations—such as unintended guest access—before they occur, reducing the need for post-creation audits and remediation.
• Enable safe self-service with guardrails. With labels enforcing access rules automatically, employees can create and manage security groups without increasing risk, restoring self-service without sacrificing control.
• Lay the foundation for future governance scenarios. Using sensitivity labels as the backbone of access policy creates a scalable framework that can extend to additional protections over time, including broader enforcement and emerging governance needs.

Try it out

Learn more about configuring security with Microsoft Entra.

Related links

• Learn how we’re using sensitivity labels to make Microsoft more secure.
• Get an overview of Microsoft Entra fundamentals documentation.
• Find out how self-service sensitivity labels to help our employees stay productive without exposing sensitive information.
• See what it took to transition our company to a Zero Trust security model.
• Explore how we’re boosting our Secure Future Initiative with a new approach to wired network security.

The post Transforming our approach to sensitivity labels at Microsoft with Microsoft Entra appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

At Microsoft Digital, the company’s IT organization, we’re using a set of employee councils to guide how we deploy and adopt AI across our organization. We took this approach for a simple reason: We need a model that can keep pace with technological change while staying grounded in business value.

Our baseline expectation for AI at Microsoft is practical.

Our AI initiatives need to deliver value every quarter, and we track progress through KPIs reviewed monthly at the leadership level. That standard creates healthy pressure. It also exposes a common gap many organizations experience in the beginning stages of their AI efforts: It’s easy to generate a lot of activity without producing business results.

“Our strategy council is how we separate signal from noise in our AI acceleration. It identifies the top scenarios with the greatest enterprise leverage, sharpens our executive focus on what truly matters, and enforces a one-to-one alignment between the work we resource and the outcomes we’re accountable to deliver.”

Don Campbell, principal group technical program manager, Microsoft Digital

In our council-based approach to AI, different councils focus on different needs. Together, they help us move from experimentation to repeatable, enterprise-grade outcomes. We think of these councils as building blocks that we can combine and evolve as the technology, the business, and our operating model change.

In this model, AI strategy needs its own council to help guide the overall approach and align our efforts across the enterprise. At the highest level, the strategy council is where we prioritize what matters most, decide how it maps to the outcomes we’re accountable for, and determine how we’ll judge progress month over month.

“Our strategy council is how we separate signal from noise in our AI acceleration,” says Don Campbell, a principal group technical program manager in Microsoft Digital. “It identifies the top scenarios with the greatest enterprise leverage, sharpens our executive focus on what truly matters, and enforces a one-to-one alignment between the work we resource and the outcomes we’re accountable to deliver.”

Strategy keeps our AI conversation at Microsoft from getting bogged down in discussions of tools and technology and forces us to keep our focus on the main goal: What are we trying to change in the business, and how will we know if we’ve succeeded?

“We need a single cohesive story to bring together what’s happening across the organization and how those efforts contribute to real impact. The goal is to stitch that story together and solve for redundancies—if one part of the org has already solved a problem, another team shouldn’t have to reinvent the solution.”

Mohit Chand, principal group engineering manager, Microsoft Digital

AI strategy in action: Focus, alignment, and a monthly cadence

As our AI work at Microsoft accelerates, we continuously balance two truths at the same time. We want broad experimentation, because it’s how teams and employees learn fast. At the same time, we want our people to focus on what matters most to our enterprise and to ensure we are identifying and reducing potential redundancy.

Maintaining this balance is the core work of our AI strategy council. It helps us identify the AI-enabled scenarios that will deliver the most value, then keeps us honest about whether we’re delivering against the outcomes we’ve committed to.

“We need a single cohesive story to bring together what’s happening across the organization and how those efforts contribute to real impact,” says Mohit Chand, a principal group engineering manager in Microsoft Digital. “The goal is to stitch that story together and solve for redundancies—if one part of the org has already solved a problem, another team shouldn’t have to reinvent the solution.”

We have a detailed process that relies on engaging with our subject matter experts to keep the most impactful AI portfolio visible and actionable. We use it to summarize and track our top scenarios. Our AI strategy council views this process as work that’s always in process—a living view that changes as products ship and priorities shift. Delivered items come off, emerging bets go on, and the continuing discussion stays anchored to our goals.

“The pace right now is incredible. There’s a lot of excitement, but there’s also a risk if it’s not sustainable. A big part of our focus is figuring out how to take churn out of the system and make this work long‑term—for the business and for our people.”

Myron Wan, principal group product manager, Microsoft Digital

A tight rhythm and monthly cadence ensures that our conversations stay focused on whether the biggest bets are moving the needles we care about. That cadence helps us answer the questions leaders and customers are asking on a regular basis:

• Where are you investing?
• Why?
• What’s working?
• What would you do differently next time?
• What did you learn along the way?
• Where are we reinvesting and creating additional agency or capabilities for our employees?

When these questions frame the conversation, the outcomes naturally align to the direction our enterprise wants to go.

Structuring strategy and execution

To make our strategy council effective, we needed more than just a monthly meeting. We needed a way to organize work, assign accountability, and compare progress across very different teams without forcing everyone into the same mold.

We use three practices to accomplish this:

• Group work into clear focus areas
• Rely on product owners to drive execution
• Use a shared approach for measuring value

“The pace right now is incredible,” says Myron Wan, a principal group product manager in Microsoft Digital. “There’s a lot of excitement, but there’s also a risk if it’s not sustainable. A big part of our focus is figuring out how to take churn out of the system and make this work long‑term—for the business and for our people.”

Working into focus areas

When we started to scale our initial AI efforts, our first challenge was simple: Everyone is building, but not always toward the same destination. That’s why we split the work into two primary focus areas that match how an IT organization operates. These areas include:

• AI for corporate functions. Our AI work supports teams like finance, legal, and HR. We focus on removing friction from core processes and helping people make faster, better decisions.
• AI for IT. We support AI initiatives across our IT operations in several areas:
  • Network and devices. We’re using AI for faster network device lifecycle management, more efficient incident management and remediations, and lower costs
  • Employee experience. We want to enable Microsoft employees to contribute real business value and enjoy how they do it.
  • Support. We’re reducing tickets, resolving issues faster, and helping support teams stay ahead instead of reacting.
  • Tenant management and security. Our AI investments strengthen how we run and protect our Microsoft 365 tenant.

From there, we map AI initiatives into those focus areas so we can see what’s happening across the landscape and spot gaps, overlaps, and opportunities to reuse what already exists.

“We operate a council which helps set direction, but product management oversees execution of the solutions. Without product management’s ownership, our council would degrade into just a low-level approval step, which quickly makes us a roadblock instead of an enabler.”

Bill O’Brien, principal group product manager, Microsoft Digital

This step sounds basic, but it changes the conversation. It moves us away from a list of disconnected projects and toward a portfolio view, where we can figure out which scenarios matter most, where we have duplication, and where we need to invest more.

Keeping execution with product owners

While our AI strategy council sets direction, execution lies strictly with our product owners. A strategy council can’t run delivery. If it tries, it slows everything down. We avoid that trap by separating direction from doing.

“We operate a council which helps set direction, but product management oversees execution of the solutions,” says Bill O’Brien, a principal group product manager in Microsoft Digital. “Without product management’s ownership, our council would degrade into just an approval step, which quickly makes us a roadblock instead of an enabler.”

This clarity on roles and responsibilities helps teams work fast and ensures the council remains strategic. Product owners can prioritize week by week, learning from usage, adjusting product features, and shipping value. The council can stay focused on the portfolio and which bets rise to the top, what tradeoffs to make, and how we communicate progress and business outcomes to leadership.

“The first part of our strategy was all about getting people to a point where they could identify what they were trying to accomplish and report on how they’re getting there. We created a value measurement framework in partnership across multiple key players to give teams an idea of what’s valuable to the organization.”

Keith Bunge, principal software engineer, Microsoft

Using a common value framework

Once we can see the portfolio and have identified clear ownership, we still need one more thing: A shared language for determining value. Early in our journey, we were tempted to declare success simply based on activity—how many pilots we launched, how many tools we built, or how many demos we could show.

That activity is critical for innovation, but it doesn’t help us understand and drive business value. We needed teams to define the value they expect to deliver, explain why, and show how they’ll measure it.

“The first part of our strategy was all about getting people to a point where they could identify what they were trying to accomplish and report on how they’re getting there,” says Keith Bunge, a principal software engineer at Microsoft. “We created a value measurement framework in partnership across multiple key players to give teams an idea of what’s valuable to the organization.”

That framework helps in two ways:

1. It forces upfront discipline: Teams clarify what value they’re chasing and how they’ll prove they’ve achieved it.
2. It allows for fair comparison across very different initiatives: Everyone is describing impact in consistent categories, rather than inventing a new scorecard each time.

As our approach matures, we’re also pushing past raw savings metrics to the harder question: What did we do with the time or money we saved, and how did this create increased agency or capabilities?

Combining strategy and execution: A practical example

Here’s how that looks when we apply this approach to a real-world scenario.

Say one of our teams is proposing an AI solution to automate energy management in buildings. On day one, the idea sounds great: use signals from internal temperature and movement sensors to automatically adjust HVAC usage across large buildings. But the role of the strategy council isn’t just to approve great ideas. We ask for a clear value claim and a measurement plan.

Bunge provides a solid value claim for the example above.

“I’m going to come up with an automation that allows me to automatically turn off air conditioning in a building based on signals that we have from our internal sensors,” he says. “I think I’m going to be able to save $100,000 a quarter with this project because of my usage projections overlaid on the HVAC costs over the past five years.”

That kind of statement is useful, because it’s specific. It also forces the next question: How do you prove it? We’re asking teams to explain what data they’ll use as a baseline, what counts as savings, and how they’ll report progress over time.

We’re also raising the bar as the program matures.

Early on, teams may be able to prove that they saved time or reduced effort. As we get more rigorous, we’re pushing the “so what” conversation: What happens with the time saved, and what changes in the business as a result? It’s all part of moving from value measures to business outcomes, including what gets reinvested and where impact actually accrues.

Connecting AI strategy to the rest of our councils

Our AI strategy council is not the final measure or a standalone solution. We use it as the front door to a broader ecosystem that helps us move AI from ideas to enterprise outcomes.

“Business strategy needs to lead the AI strategy. Business strategy defines the ‘what and why.’ AI defines the ‘how’ to get the business strategy implemented with real value. We need to use AI to help us achieve the business strategy, not the other way around.”

Qingsu Wu, principal group product manager, Microsoft Digital

Here’s how it fits together in practice. We use the strategy council to set our direction, and we keep a short list of top scenarios visible. Then we rely on complementary councils and capability groups to make those scenarios real: teams are building skills and patterns through enablement, strengthening foundations through data readiness, and applying Responsible AI practices so solutions scale safely.

We use process improvement and change management to drive adoption, because a strong model doesn’t matter if people don’t change how they work. And we use metrics and value tracking to keep the entire system accountable.

We’re also keeping a clear principle at the center: Business strategy leads, AI follows.

“Business strategy needs to lead the AI strategy,” says Qingsu Wu, a principal group product manager in Microsoft Digital. “Business strategy defines the “what and why.” AI defines the ‘how” to get the business strategy implemented with real value. We need to use AI to help us achieve the business strategy, not the other way around.”

That distinction matters as AI capabilities keep expanding and as teams continue to move faster.

Moving forward

As this work matures, one thing is clear: Strategy isn’t something we finish and move on from. It’s something we’re actively maintaining as AI adoption accelerates.

What we’ll do next is consistent with that mindset.

We plan to keep scaling what works while tightening and improving the system around it. We’re strengthening alignment across teams, pushing for more consistent measurement of impact, and sharpening how we choose the right approach for the right problem. We’re also treating strategy as a living motion, not an annual document, because business and technology are constantly changing.

We know that what got us here isn’t going to get us where we need to go next. We’re excited about the continued evolution of AI strategy here at Microsoft Digital as we focus on scale, alignment to real business problems, and making sure the pace is sustainable for our business.

Key takeaways

Leaders who are scaling AI across IT can apply these lessons from our experience to stay focused, move faster, and deliver measurable business impact.

• Treat strategy as an ongoing practice. We’re revisiting priorities regularly to keep our AI work aligned with changing business goals.
• Separate direction from execution. We’re using a small strategy group to set focus and expectations while product teams remain accountable for delivery.
• Create a shared language for value. A consistent way to describe impact helps leaders compare initiatives, make tradeoffs, and explain progress with confidence.
• Let experimentation mature into focus. Early exploration builds capability, but scaling requires narrowing attention to the AI scenarios that matter most.
• Design for scale and sustainability. We’re paying as much attention to reuse, data readiness, and team sustainability as we are to speed and innovation.

Try it out

New to Microsoft 365 Copilot? Check it out!

Related links

• Check out how our data council is powering our unified data strategy at Microsoft.
• Learn how we’re powering the technical veracity of AI at Microsoft with a Center of Excellence.
• Find out how we’re reshaping Microsoft with continuous improvement and AI.
• Learn more about our approach to Responsible AI at Microsoft.
• Read about the enterprise tools and solutions at Microsoft AI.
• Learn how Azure AI apps and agents can help you build enterprise-scale AI solutions.

The post Visualizing success: Steering your AI deployment with a strategy council appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

• Introduction
• Chapter 1: Building your agent governance strategy
• Chapter 2: Establishing a solid data foundation for agent governance
• Chapter 3: A matrixed approach to agent governance
• Chapter 4: Tracking, impact, and value
• Conclusion: Governing the frontier

Empowering employees and protecting your organization through agent governance

Welcome to the agentic frontier

Agents are expanding the frontier of enterprise AI. By creating tools that surface knowledge, take actions, and even reinvent workflows, organizations can apply the power of AI to business processes in new and innovative ways.

But this shift raises questions for business and IT leaders: How do you get the benefits of agents without putting your organization and employees at risk? How do you encourage citizen developers to create agents freely while maintaining control, security, privacy, and compliance?

At Microsoft Digital, the company’s IT organization, we’re putting practical governance structures in place to ensure our internal agents are useful, safe, and properly scoped. Through a deliberate strategy of empowerment with established guardrails, we’re unlocking the potential of agentic transformation while maintaining the trust that defines our work.

Read and prepare

Check out our complete guide to deploying and adopting agents across the enterprise, based on our own experience here at Microsoft.

The AI maturity model and frontier transformation

Agentic AI has made a new operational model possible, one that blends machine intelligence with human judgment, creating AI-operated, human-led teams.

We call organizations that enact this model Frontier Firms.

As organizations move toward this new operational state, they progress from foundational AI assistance through escalating levels of agentic maturity and complexity. First, humans operate with help from an AI assistant like Microsoft 365 Copilot. Then, human-agent teams work together. But the future lies with humans leading teams of agent users: AI agents that perform core labor with relative autonomy.

Capturing the benefits of this model relies on many factors, but in our experience as Microsoft Digital, two main tenets are instrumental to a successful transformation:

1. Empowering employees and teams to create and experiment with their own agents
2. Properly governing those agents to protect the enterprise

It’s a balance. If you set agent builders free without the proper guardrails, you risk data overexposure, agent sprawl, and security vulnerabilities. However, being too restrictive about governance stifles individual imagination, workflow reinvention, and innovation that can come from agentic AI.

“At Microsoft, we’ve moved beyond envisioning the agentic future into operating within it every day. Our experience as Customer Zero gives us a unique perspective on what it takes to govern AI agents at scale, turning early lessons into proven practices that help organizations innovate with confidence.”

Brian Fielder, vice president, Microsoft Digital

We’re here to help you find the right balance for your organization.

This guide shares what we’ve learned along the way. As you read, you’ll follow our journey as Customer Zero at Microsoft, and you’ll gain access to tips and resources that we’ve assembled to help you apply our expertise to your own agent governance practice.

Every organization is different, and your experience will differ from ours in terms of risk tolerance, technical capability, resourcing, and more. This guide highlights some principles and best practices you can apply to your own business context, needs, and objectives.

“At Microsoft, we’ve moved beyond envisioning the agentic future into operating within it every day,” says Brian Fielder, vice president of Microsoft Digital. “Our experience as Customer Zero gives us a unique perspective on what it takes to govern AI agents at scale, turning early lessons into proven practices that help organizations innovate with confidence.”

Now is the time to seize this opportunity. Follow along to start your own journey toward frontier transformation and capture the benefits of trusted, connected agentic intelligence.

Learn from our experience governing agents

Within Microsoft Digital, we’ve been acting as Customer Zero for frontier transformation by creating the tools, infrastructure, and processes that power agents at Microsoft.

Our goal is to make it easy for employees to engage with agentic tools freely and adaptably while maintaining safety and responsibility. The path to this objective relies on a three-pronged approach to governance:

• Embedded governance functionality: Agent creation and publishing tools should incorporate good guidance, governance, and guardrails out of the box, making agents people create essentially self-governing.
• IT oversight: This is a new space and a new way of working, so it isn’t feasible for all agents to self-govern at this point. As an IT organization, we fill gaps in governance through reviews and oversight. We establish risk-based policies around types of agents, exposure and sharing, and other pivots.
• User education: It’s almost impossible to predict every governance gap and need, so educating our users helps them avoid accidentally increasing risk. Our Agents at Microsoft team and individual change managers are the guides for these efforts. Employees can also refer to resources like Microsoft Learn courses and the Agent Builders SharePoint hub.

Throughout this journey, we’ve empowered our employees to create all kinds of agents, ranging from simple personal tools built by people working in every function, with every level of technical skill, all the way to AI-powered enterprise tools designed by professional developers for use across lines of business and even the entire company.

As part of the process, we’ve incorporated guardrails to ensure less technical employees are limited to tools that simply retrieve enterprise knowledge, such as SharePoint Agent Builder or Copilot Studio, while software engineers get the full power of any tool they need that can take action or automate workflows, including Microsoft Foundry and Microsoft 365 Agent Toolkit.

Over the course of this journey, we’ve learned valuable lessons about effective agent governance, including:

• How to build an impactful but flexible governance strategy
• Strategies for creating an AI-ready data ecosystem
• Ways to apply appropriate policies and controls for highly diverse agents
• Approaches for tracking the impact and value of agents

Chapter 1: Building your agent governance strategy

Thinking through your organizational needs and building a framework to govern agents

As we’ve incorporated agents into different aspects of our organization, we’ve also deepened their involvement in employees’ daily workflows and core business processes. Because of this, we’re diligent about the governance guardrails and policies that protect our organization.

We’ve accumulated a wealth of knowledge and insights in this area through our efforts governing Microsoft 365 Copilot. Based on this experience, some of the key priorities that we made sure to adhere to included:

• Effectively applying controls to ensure users and apps don’t get access to privileged information
• Preventing employees from creating agents that violate company policies
• Balancing the freedom for employees to share their creations with the need to prevent agent sprawl
• Delineating which agents are authoritative and applicable for enterprise functions and which ones are meant for employees’ own personal use.
• Inventorying agents to provide lifecycle management
• Securing and protecting confidential data while respecting our responsible AI principles: Fairness, reliability and safety, privacy and security, transparency, accountability, and inclusiveness
• Unlocking telemetry that enables us to govern agents effectively

By focusing on each of these dimensions, our governance team has centered its efforts on the value these agents provide to the company while also ensuring organizational safety and trust. To realize this value, we emphasize three key principles that help protect both our employees and the organization:

Security

We’ve established standards for data classification, policies for handling confidential information, and other security measures to protect data from unauthorized access, misuse, and disclosures. Microsoft Purview powers these capabilities through data labeling, rights management, and data loss prevention.

Privacy

Privacy compliance measures keep personal data protected and ensure agents adhere to regulatory frameworks in the regions where we operate. We conduct regular privacy assessments for all applications, including high-impact agents.

Regulation

Regulatory compliance assessments ensure agents meet prevailing legal standards. Our legal and compliance teams carefully monitor AI guidelines, regulations, and laws as they evolve so we can understand and incorporate them into these assessments.

We incorporated elements of our tenant’s minimum bar for governance into how we secure agents. Those include Microsoft Purview Information Protection, a functional inventory, activity logging, lifecycle management, and the ability to properly isolate agents so that they don’t cross data boundaries.

Our overarching tenant governance strategy is to govern items like documents and data at the container level. However, within a SharePoint site, for example, the added functionality of agents demands that we introduce further controls like sharing limits, breadth of knowledge sources, agent metadata, and information about an agent’s behaviors.

Turning priorities into principles

To operationalize governance, we developed six principles that guide our approach to agents. They form the governance foundation for a wide matrix of agent creation and usage opportunities.

1. We ensure a strong data hygiene foundation so we can trust our data estate as employees build and use agents.
2. We empower employees to build personal agents that can access permitted services and data sources to help automate and accelerate their tasks.
3. We empower teams and lines of business to build agents with known lower-risk patterns to accelerate impact.
4. We provide a smooth release path for engineering teams to develop agents designed for enterprise functions so they can access all the services and sources they need. This includes the same software development lifecycle (SDLC) reviews and certifications as other enterprise software, which we outline in Chapter 3.
5. We accelerate innovation through agent and automation templates while maintaining an AI Center of Excellence (CoE) to help teams think through their opportunities.
6. We reimagine employee experiences and task execution to simplify and optimize productivity.

Read and prepare

Powering the technical veracity of AI at Microsoft with a Center of Excellence.

Securing control through agent lifecycles

As we strategized to operationalize good governance, agent lifecycles became one of our most crucial tools. We superimposed the enterprise lifecycle on top of these policies, with both user-based and attestation-based lifecycles.

This means we treat agents owned by individual employees like any other user app and delete them when they leave the organization. Meanwhile, we ensure that agents owned by teams have a lifecycle that’s defined by the tenant and tied to attestation, our internal enterprise SDLC, and accountability confirmations.

This approach helps us combat sprawl by eliminating agents that no longer serve a purpose. It provides a solid foundation for more fine-tuned, matrixed policies and practices.

Governing amid real-time technology acceleration

One recent development illustrates how the rapid advancement of AI technology requires us to stay ahead of policy for new features.

Model Context Protocol (MCP) adds new capabilities, but also new risks and challenges. It’s a simple standard that lets AI systems communicate with the right tools and data without custom integration work. Instead of building a new connection or API every time, teams plug into a common pattern.

That standardization delivers speed and flexibility, but it also changes the security equation. We’ve extended our security and governance practices to account for MCP servers.

Our practices and policies help us govern agents effectively in this new environment. First, we assess security across four layers: Applications and agents, the AI platform, data, and infrastructure. We establish a secure-by-default strategy by positioning every remote MCP server behind our API gateway and establishing practices for vetting, identity management, automation that slows agents at the right moments, context trimming, and server isolation.

As you define policies for governing your own agentic ecosystem, you can take inspiration from our process. Start by asking questions about what you want to accomplish and what you want to protect, then move on to establishing your most important priorities. From there, you can cement those priorities into policies.

Learning from our approach to agent governance strategy

Match policies to progress on your AI journey

The complexity of agent governance depends on the maturity of your organization and where you are in your adoption journey. Start slowly to let that maturity grow over time.

A strong policy framework is the foundation

Lean on existing app governance policies, then layer agent-specific structures on top.

Take your cues from established standards

Global regulations around privacy, security, and responsible AI provide a good baseline for establishing governance policies. Assign teams to work through these regulations and incorporate their insights into your agent governance strategy.

Decide on your comfort level with risk

Bring cross-disciplinary experts together from across your organization to determine what level of risk is acceptable for different agents and their use cases. Put guardrails in place for low-risk scenarios and establish processes for supporting more complex or sensitive use cases. Evaluate what data sources agents can extract information from. Establish whether users have shared sensitive data sources.

Change is constant

Plan to reassess and revise your governance structure regularly. Agents are evolving rapidly, as is the tooling surrounding them, so maintaining good governance policies will be an ongoing practice.

Governance is a value driver for employees

Governance isn’t just about protecting your organization. It also provides the right patterns to make sure your employees are getting value from agents. Establish strong measures of business value and a robust methodology for management and assessment of agents through ongoing tracking. This kind of observation and telemetry is foundational and should be a key part of your governance efforts.

Key takeaways

Use these tips based on what we learned here at Microsoft to build your strategy for agent governance at your company:

• Establish a cross-disciplinary agent Center of Excellence. Bring together stakeholders across the organization to define priorities, goals, and shared practices for agent adoption.
• Right-size oversight based on risk. Determine your organization’s risk tolerance and define which agents require more or less involvement from IT, security, and compliance teams.
• Operationalize agent oversight and management. Establish an oversight model and implement tools that help manage agents at scale.
• Establish change management and adoption. Determine and implement a strategy for driving adoption to educate and empower employees.
• Create a centralized governance and information hub. Provide employees and agent builders with a single place to find guidance, standards, and governance information.

Learn more

How we did it at Microsoft

• Find out how we’re protecting AI conversations at Microsoft with MCP security and governance. This post outlines how we’re streamlining MCP governance through secure-by-default architecture, automation, and inventory.
• Explore our IT playbook for the AI era and learn how we’re becoming a Frontier Firm. This article shares our journey as an IT organization in support of this new operating model.
• Discover how Microsoft is becoming an AI-first Frontier Firm. This story shares how we’re approaching the idea of an agentic future.
• Read our five-step guide for IT leaders who want to drive greater AI maturity. This resource can help you chart a course through AI maturity to reimagine what’s possible for the enterprise.
• Learn from our experience tackling Microsoft 365 Copilot governance. This guide details our governance efforts for Microsoft 365 Copilot and can serve as a starting point for agentic governance.

Further guidance for you

• Secure your agents at scale with Microsoft Agent 365 guidance for unified identity, compliance, and control across platforms.
• Learn about the responsible AI policies and practices that guide our use of AI at Microsoft.

Chapter 2: Establishing a solid data foundation for agent governance

Setting agents up for success using a secure, robust data foundation

Operating according to an escalating maturity model means we’ve done the foundational work to secure and govern our data estate for Microsoft 365 Copilot. Many of the same principles apply to agents, with the added complexity of incorporating additional data sources.

To lead these efforts, we established a cross-functional team of data professionals within our AI CoE. This team is mostly comprised of Microsoft Digital employees who support corporate functions like Corporate, External, and Legal Affairs (CELA) and Global Workplace Services. Together with our AI CoE, this team helped us define what it means to have AI-ready data.

In essence, AI-ready data just means information we’ve certified for AI workloads. We certify those data sources using Microsoft Purview to identify defects in our core data products, and we’ve also built AI-powered assessments to certify which data lakes are AI-ready.

In most ways, governance is tool-agnostic and rooted in basic principles. With robust data labeling, data hygiene, and permissions in place alongside our AI tools, which respect labels by default, we can confidently give every employee the ability to build basic agents and trust in our governance guardrails. For decades, the challenge of data analysts and engineers was maintaining a consistently reliable source of truth despite inconsistent data quality, insufficient governance, and years of collecting data in silos. Microsoft Fabric and Microsoft Purview can help resolve these issues.

We’re embracing a more balanced, federated approach to data management today. We call this approach a data mesh. Rather than allowing unchecked decentralization or forcing all our data into a single centralized system, the data mesh formalizes domain ownership while embedding governance, quality, and interoperability directly into shared platforms.

The data mesh connects and distributes, data products across domains, enabling shared data access and compute while scaling beyond centralized architectures.

Platform services are standardized blueprints that embed security, interoperability, policies, standards, and core capabilities — providing guardrails that enable speed without fragmentation.

Data management zones provide centralized governance capabilities for policy enforcement, lineage, observability, compliance, and enterprise-width trust.

With this approach, our domain teams publish data as well-defined, discoverable products, while common standards for security, metadata, and compliance are enforced through automation rather than manual processes. This model preserves enterprise trust and consistency without sacrificing speed or autonomy. By adopting a data mesh mindset, we can scale analytics and AI more effectively across the organization while still keeping ownership closely connected to the business focus.

Confidentiality labels, the practical framework for data protection

To operate according to Zero Trust principles, we needed a coherent system that lets us see, label, and protect data. Otherwise, the burden of data loss prevention would fall solely on employees, who would have to exercise individual discretion whenever they decided how to house and share potentially sensitive content.

With labeling, it’s important to strike a balance between the depth necessary for supporting an array of data governance controls and the simplicity to ensure labeling isn’t burdensome for users.

We decided on four overarching labels for container and file classification, each with its own sub-labels. The highest-level schema looks like this:

1. Highly confidential: We only share our most critical data with named recipients.
2. Confidential: Any items crucial to achieving our goals feature limited distribution.
3. General: Employees can share daily work–like personal settings and postal codes–internally throughout Microsoft.
4. Public: We share unrestricted data meant for public consumption freely. That includes information like publicly released source code and openly announced financials.

For our risk tolerance and organizational needs, we made the decision to protect data designated confidential or higher. As a result, we contain data flows to their tenants and only trust suitable storage destinations for content. That suitability depends on a storage location’s ability to gate which connectors can work with particular source data and sensitivity labels.

The administrators responsible for workspaces like SharePoint sites set default labels. These labels serve as a foundation for appropriate access and circulation for objects within those containers. It takes the burden of labeling off of employees. The sensitivity labels that administrators apply map to several different categories of policies that can anticipate and help to mitigate data loss and risk.

They communicate four key areas:

1. Breadth of availability: Labels determine whether the workspace is broadly available internally or is a private site.
2. External permissions: We administer guest allowance via the group’s classification, allowing specified partners to access teams when appropriate.
3. Sharing guidelines: We tie important governance policies to the container’s label. For example, can an employee share this workspace outside of Microsoft? Is this group limited to a specific division or team? Is it restricted to specific people? The label establishes these rules.
4. Conditional access: While we haven’t implemented this policy at Microsoft, tying identity and device verification to container labels can introduce additional governance controls.

Within Microsoft Digital, we’ve put a lot of thought into how each of our labels aligns with relevant policies. You can see more of the logic behind our sensitivity labels and their policies in this graphic:

If a container owner needs different policies for a set of files to provide greater external access, they can self-service new groups without accidentally violating our governance practices.

At Microsoft, we use Microsoft Purview, which is our suite of data estate management tools, but you can use your tool of choice to apply labels in your environment. Microsoft tools will respect them. Microsoft Purview helps us accomplish three important tasks: mapping our labeling structure onto the relevant policies, verifying them against our standards, and backstopping self-service data loss prevention practices through automation.

Automation is particularly useful. We’ve configured Microsoft Purview Information Protection to scan automatically for wayward credentials, malicious user behaviors, and other sensitive information in items without the proper protections. When Purview detects a violation, our governance team receives alerts that prompt them to contain the risk by upgrading an item’s sensitivity label or requiring employees to remedy the issue.

The result is a system that allows flexibility for employees to self-manage their digital workspaces while providing guardrails that help our governance experts take appropriate actions without overtaxing their time and resources.

Our approach within Microsoft Digital is just one way to create an AI-ready data estate, but aspects of our story will hold true for almost any organization. Consider establishing a body to take over responsibility for AI-ready data, developing your primary goals for AI-ready data, unifying your data estate, and implementing a system of confidentiality labels.

Learning from our approach to agent governance strategy

Define the responsibility for AI-ready data

Identify and assign enterprise data owners to implement and oversee the processes that guarantee data quality.

Create intuitive labels

Your employees will be the ones applying labels, so make those labels intuitive. For example, “highly confidential” is easy to understand, while “business-critical” could be interpreted in many ways from a sensitivity standpoint.

Don’t overwhelm your users

Make labeling simple and intuitive to ensure it isn’t overwhelming. Employees should have a limited set of choices to keep things comprehensible.

Use existing defaults

Identify the security needs and regulatory compliance that are specific to your organization and use built-in governance controls available through Microsoft tools.

Key takeaways

You can use these tips based on what we learned here at Microsoft to tackle agent governance at your company:

• Establish a cross-functional data council. Form a data council to help promote a culture of AI-ready data with professionals from all relevant disciplines, including human resources, legal, security, IT, and anyone else who can share relevant expertise.
• Certify datasets for AI workloads. Limit agents to datasets that have been certified as “AI-ready” to minimize hallucinations and reasoning errors.
• Define your labeling parameters. Keep the number of labels to five main labels with five sub-labels each. The fewer you use, the better.
• Align your sensitivity labels with policies. Consider how your labels line up with breadth of availability, external permissions, sharing guidelines, and conditional access.

Learn more

How we did it at Microsoft

• Follow our journey as we transform our data culture with AI-ready data. This story highlights how we’re using Microsoft Fabric and Microsoft Purview to revolutionize our approach to data governance and AI readiness here at Microsoft.
• Discover how a data council is powering our unified data strategy at Microsoft. This post tells the story of how the Microsoft Digital Data Council is leading our efforts to adopt an AI-ready data strategy.
• See how we’re conditioning our unstructured data for AI at Microsoft. This article explains our internal strategies for handling unstructured data, which can be surfaced by AI agents.

Further guidance for you

• Learn about governance and security for agents and how to keep your AI initiatives secure across your organization.
• Establish responsible AI policies for AI agents to support ethical, transparent, and accountable AI agent deployment across your organization.

Chapter 3: A matrixed approach to agent governance

Governing different types of agents for different contexts, built with different toolsets

Our customers have expressed a strong desire to start building agents, but they’re concerned about where to begin and how to manage those agents once they’re built. They worry about persistent problems such as hallucinations and agent sprawl. These concerns are especially pronounced on IT teams.

During our Customer Zero journey, we’ve learned that the diversity of agent types and creation methods means there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to governance. Generalized approaches will only get you so far.

We’ve found it helpful to think about different kinds of agents along an escalating spectrum of development complexity:

There’s an entire matrix of different parameters that apply to an agent at any level of this spectrum, and they all require different policies. Those parameters include:

• Level of reach: Personal agents, limited sharing (like development environments or team boundaries), or enterprise-wide distribution
• Agent-building tool: SharePoint agent builder, Agent Builder in Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft Copilot Studio, or tools geared to more professional developers (such as Microsoft Foundry or Microsoft 365 Agent Toolkit)
• Knowledge sources and content accuracy: Public sites, SharePoint and OneDrive, directly uploaded files, enterprise apps and systems, or third-party knowledge bases

Each of these parameters creates a pivot that we need to govern, and we’ve carefully assembled a set of policies and controls to account for them. As our understanding and use of agents advances, we’re continually updating how we match their characteristics and capabilities with relevant policies and any applicable reviews.

Within Microsoft Digital, we’ve adopted a risk-based approach that helps us establish a matrixed model for agent governance. The foundational idea is that we identify potential harms for each kind of agent, then assign policies for the level of review and oversight they require.

For example, simple agents that can only read and present data tend to be low risk. Because their access is tied to their creators’ identities and access, our data governance structures and guardrails can prevent overexposure. But for agents that have capabilities like writing data, taking action, or creating items, more reviews are necessary.

A matrix of agent governance policies, pivoted by parameter

The following matrix enumerates the factors that determine how we govern different kinds of agents created using different tools. This matrix helps our employees understand the agent creation process and helps us maintain safety and control.

In addition to mapping out our policies for governing agents, the matrix illustrates how we see their relative utility across the organization. It demonstrates an escalation from personally useful to organizationally useful agents. Their governance policies and controls escalate accordingly.

Regionality is an additional concern. Regulatory compliance might vary, but it’s important to keep in mind that certain kinds of data access and actions might be perfectly permissible in one region, but not in another.

One example is our Employee Self-Service Agent, a central resource employees can turn to for help with IT support, HR questions, and facilities requests. Because it can access potentially sensitive personal information, this agent required additional review from European works councils to ensure it met all relevant workplace standards.

As you facilitate the experimentation and innovation with agents across your workforce from citizen developers to pro developers, consider adopting a similar matrixed approach to agent governance. It starts with understanding your organization’s needs, your risk tolerance, and the different employee populations you want to equip with agent-building capabilities.

Learning from our matrixed approach to agent governance

Figure out your building environment strategy

Decide which scenarios match up with specific environments and make those environments available to the relevant employees.

Design governance structures that scale from low-code to more advanced agentic tools

With the proliferation of AI agents, platform-level approvals similar to the Power Platform model at Microsoft can ensure rapid innovation while requiring review for individual high-impact scenarios.

Build trust through transparency and structure

A clear, well-documented approval process helps internal regulatory advisors understand new AI technologies and establishes the trust needed for productive, long-term collaboration.

Treat regional partners as strategic allies in the agentic future

Early feedback on digital agents from regional partners like works councils helps improve product design, accelerate approvals, and reduce fear or misconceptions about AI in the workplace.

Don’t forget that Copilot Studio is part of Power Platform

You can use what you’ve learned empowering citizen developers in Power Platform to guide your work with agents.

Key takeaways

Use these tips based on what we learned here at Microsoft to tackle agent governance at your company:

• Establish your tolerance for risk. Determine where the most prevalent risks emerge across different populations and kinds of agents. Remember, you control the guardrails in your environment.
• Determine what agent-building tools you want to roll out and who can use them. Different populations benefit from different agent-building capabilities. Put thought into what individuals and teams can create and the degree of partnership each level will need from IT.
• Define your governance parameters for different kinds of agents. Determine the best ways to hedge against risk at every level. For example, you might choose to trust in tenant governance for simple agents and establish reviews for more complex tools.

Learn more

How we did it at Microsoft

• See how we’re empowering employees with the Power Platform. This article explains how our Power Platform governance model influenced our matrixed approach to agent governance.
• Learn how our employees are building their own AI tools. This article describes how knowledge workers at Microsoft are forging their own agents to help improve efficiency and get more done.
• Check out our lessons learned using SharePoint agents at Microsoft. This post shows how we approached governance for low-risk, knowledge-only agents through our deployment of SharePoint agents.
• Read how we’re unlocking enterprise AI extensibility with Copilot Studio. This story explores how we govern more advanced agents built with Copilot Studio, including connectors, orchestration, and scaled governance.

Further guidance for you

• Explore governance and security for AI agents across the organization with Microsoft Learn content.
• Check out this industry-standard framework that validates matrixed, risk-based governance approaches for AI systems.

Chapter 4: Tracking, impact, and value

Managing agents and assessing their business impact for the organization

It’s clear that agents bring astonishing capabilities to the enterprise. For many organizations, what remains unclear is exactly how to measure their impact. Without that information, businesses are at a loss for ways to articulate value and drive improvement.

Tracking agents is also a crucial component of preventing sprawl: We need to understand what agents we have, how employees are using them, what critical processes they’re supporting, and if they’re contributing value or need to be retired.

We’re at the beginning of our impact-tracking journey, but our work can provide a starting point for your own efforts to measure the value of AI initiatives at your organization.

Managing our agent catalog through comprehensive tracking

Microsoft Digital partners with other internal organizations to ensure we’re prioritizing the right agents and avoiding agent sprawl. Ideally, these engagements take place before teams start building their agents so we can avoid wasted effort or duplicated work.

Still, ongoing management efforts are crucial to keeping our agent ecosystem healthy. Telemetry is the key to assessing usage and ensuring compliance. We’ve developed our own internal tooling to ensure that:

• Metadata is complete and available
• The tooling tells us the right information about our agents
• The tools connect properly with other compliance tooling, like Microsoft Purview

This telemetry also reveals agent behaviors, shows how agents do their work, and tracks events, actions, and policy baselines.

These capabilities help us gain visibility into policy adherence and violations, and then to conduct enforcement actions. We also track the speed of reaction and mitigation. AI-ready data and robust guardrails mean we head off most violations before they occur.

A robust inventory, an agile policy framework, and an automated workflow for enforcement are cornerstones for successfully governing agents at scale.

The release of Microsoft Agent 365, now in early access, represents the next step in agent observability and management, two key aspects of agent governance and sprawl mitigation. This control pane for agents incorporates many of our learnings as we’ve bridged governance gaps through IT intervention.

Some of the key aspects of the control pane:

The registry

Provides a complete view of agents, and the enterprise agent store makes it easy to find the right agents for each role and business process within familiar workflows in Microsoft 365 Copilot and Teams.

Visualization

Delivers the observability layer, including role-specific oversight, compliance and audit features, and performance measurements that can help organizations track their agents’ impact and see where they contribute value.

Interoperability

Ensures Agent 365 is open to any Microsoft-built or partner ecosystem, while delivering work intelligence through access to data and Microsoft 365 apps.

Security features

Provide crucial confidence through visibility into security posture, detection and response capabilities, and intelligent runtime defense.

As Customer Zero for Agent 365, we’re excited to have a platform for observability and telemetry that encompasses everything from agentic creation through usage.

Tracking governance from agent inception

Professionally developed agents add a new dimension of tracking and governance, because we need standards in place for ensuring compliant agent-building and to remediate any issues.

We use our Azure DevOps instance to catalog apps on our tenant, and we’ve applied this practice to agents created professionally for lines of business and enterprise agents. This tool contains our service tree with product and app log registration, which is tied to our KPI dashboard and scoring system that validates agent data against our policies.

Our expectation is that all new apps and agents start from a place of compliance. Any new agent is registered through this platform, and we expect adherence within the first 14 days. In our experience, the introduction of new metrics, policies, or timeframes as our governance policies evolve is where agents tend to drop out of compliance. The priority is restoring compliant status.

We’ve established a series of metrics to help track and manage these expectations:

• Enablement velocity
• Renewal velocity
• Agents in compliance
• Time to remediation of noncompliance

Through a DevOps process built on our preexisting software development lifecycle practices, we’ve applied governance not only to agents themselves, but to the process of building them professionally.

Measuring progress and unlocking value

Properly measuring value depends on concrete definitions of success and metrics that support it. Articulating AI’s impact came with several challenges. First, we had to land on a consistent taxonomy for different measurement areas. Then we needed to make the relevant data accessible, ensure its quality, and confirm it made sense.

The Microsoft Digital AI Value Framework is our flexible, modular tool for measuring the impact of our AI initiatives. With tools for measurement firmly in place, we can effectively demonstrate value and guide further decision-making.

We plan to use the following capabilities to improve the overall ecosystem:

• Filtering our agent inventory on specific criteria like the type of agent or how it was built
• Enhancing governance-specific actions we can take with agents in areas like ownership and quarantining
• Gaining visibility into trends like agent usage
• Ingesting agent blueprints and defining policy templates

We’re still in the midst of our agentic measurement journey at Microsoft, but the blueprint for tracking already exists. Your organization might be in the early stages of agent readiness and deployment. If that’s the case, it could be helpful for you to internalize the lessons we’ve learned as Customer Zero and apply them as early as possible in your own journey toward AI maturity.

Learning from our agent adoption experience

Think proactively, not retroactively

If you put effort into tracking agentic impact early in your AI maturity journey, you’ll be poised to start capturing insights immediately instead of applying your methodology retroactively.

Involve a wide array of stakeholders

This workstream needs oversight from different kinds of stakeholders, including your leadership team, IT, Microsoft 365 administrators, agent developers and builders, and employee champions. That will provide the sponsorship, expertise, and perspective you need for success.

Different measurements will be appropriate for different phases of your initiatives

These measurements include monthly, weekly, or daily active usage; consider which metrics make sense at each phase of an AI initiative.

Establish a continuum of value

Agents need to tie into real business goals, so it’s important to establish metrics that actually speak to those objectives. Cascade business goals to concrete KPIs with well-defined timelines and track those diligently.

Embrace the red

Try to think of underperformance not as failure, but as data. Performance data over time helps you course correct or pivot, making sure you invest where it matters.

Key takeaways

Here are some important steps to keep in mind as you embark on your own tracking and measurement efforts for agents:

• Establish priorities and parameters for tracking agents. Consider measurements that relate to sprawl, usage, and coverage, and build them into your telemetry tooling.
• Pull your stakeholders together to establish measurement parameters. Cascade business priorities into measurable value.
• Conduct ongoing tracking. Establish a cadence for tracking and reviewing progress with your team.

Learn more

How we did it at Microsoft

• Learn how we’re measuring the impact of Microsoft 365 Copilot and AI at Microsoft. Discover our framework for tracking the impact of the investments in AI that we’re making internally.
• Find out how we’re deploying Microsoft Agent 365 internally. This story shares our intentions for using our unified control pane for agents.
• See how we’re building an AI-powered continuous improvement culture at Microsoft. This article outlines our approach to continuous improvement.
• Check out how we’re reshaping Microsoft with continuous improvement and AI. This post discusses the importance of continuous improvement for accelerating AI at Microsoft, including three initiatives already underway.

Further guidance for you

• This Microsoft Learn guidance helps organizations align AI investments with strategic goals and measurable outcomes over time.
• Explore a cloud adoption framework that provides practical guidance for defining success metrics, tracking ROI, and tying AI initiatives to business outcomes.

Governing the frontier to scale innovation

AI agents are rapidly becoming core contributors to how work gets done. As our experience within Microsoft Digital demonstrates, realizing their full potential demands more than powerful tools or enthusiastic builders. It requires thoughtful governance that evolves alongside your AI maturity, protects what matters, and gives employees the confidence to innovate responsibly.

As you consider your own strategy for managing agents, it can be helpful to keep one truth in mind: Governance is a catalyst for progress, not a barrier. By embedding guardrails into tools, grounding agent creation in AI‑ready data, applying risk‑based and matrixed policies, and reinforcing all of it through adoption and education, we’ve been able to expand agentic capability without sacrificing security, privacy, or trust.

From our experience, we’ve learned that governance works best when it’s:

• Proportional, scaling with risk and agent complexity
• Embedded, not bolted on after the fact
• Human‑led, recognizing that accountability and judgment remain essential
• Iterative, adapting as technology, regulations, and business needs evolve

When you design governance this way, it allows experimentation, learning, and impact at scale. Employees feel empowered to build agents that solve real problems, while IT and compliance teams gain visibility and control without becoming bottlenecks. Crucially, leaders can measure value, manage risk, and make informed decisions about where to invest next.

“At Microsoft, we believe the future of agentic AI depends on governance that empowers people first. The structures should be invisible when they’re working, intentional when they’re needed, and trusted by everyone they serve.”

Vijaya Alaparthi, principal group product manager, Microsoft Digital

This is the foundation of the Frontier Firm: Organizations where humans lead and agents operate, guided by clear principles and trusted systems.

As you continue your AI maturity journey, remember that there is no single, correct governance model. Your approach will reflect your risk tolerance, regulatory environment, data maturity, and organizational culture. The practices outlined here provide a proven starting point informed by real-world deployment at enterprise scale.

“At Microsoft, we believe the future of agentic AI depends on governance that empowers people first,” says Vijaya Alaparthi, principal group product manager in Microsoft Digital. “The structures should be invisible when they’re working, intentional when they’re needed, and trusted by everyone they serve.”

Now is the moment to act. Start with strong foundations. Empower your builders. Measure what matters. And treat governance not as a constraint, but as a strategic advantage that allows your organization to move faster, innovate safely, and lead confidently on the agentic frontier.

Key takeaways

Here are the high-level learnings and insights that you need to consider as you embark on your own agent governance journey, based on what we’ve learned here at Microsoft:

• Treat governance as an enabler of innovation, not a brake. Effective agent governance is what makes large‑scale innovation possible. When you embed guardrails into platforms, data, and processes, employees can build and experiment confidently without exposing the organization to unnecessary risk or slowing progress.
• Match governance rigor to agent risk and maturity. Not all agents need the same level of oversight. A risk‑based, matrixed approach lets organizations trust lightweight, personal agents while applying deeper reviews to agents that write data, take actions, or operate across business‑critical systems.
• Start with AI‑ready data and zero‑trust foundations. Strong agent governance rests on secure, well‑labeled, high‑quality data. Clear ownership, intuitive sensitivity labels, default protections, and automation reduce reliance on user judgment and allow agents to operate safely at scale.
• Embed governance where agents are built and used. The most effective governance is built into tools and workflows, not enforced through manual reviews alone. Defaults, limits, identity‑based access, lifecycle controls, and telemetry should apply automatically so agents are governed by design.
• Plan for the full agent lifecycle to prevent sprawl. Agent inventories, ownership models, attestation, and retirement processes are essential. Governance needs to account for how you create, share, evolve, audit, and ultimately decommission agents, whether individuals or enterprise teams are responsible for building them.
• Reinforce governance through adoption and education. Guardrails work best when employees understand them. Targeted adoption programs, clear guidance, prerequisites for advanced tools, and visible leadership sponsorship can help employees build responsibly and recognize their role in protecting the organization.
• Measure what matters to prove value and drive improvement. Visibility drives trust. Telemetry, observability, and clear metrics that span productivity, quality, risk reduction, and experience allow organizations to track impact, course‑correct early, and continuously improve their agent ecosystem.

Learn more

• Discover our IT playbook for becoming an AI-driven Frontier Firm.
• Learn how to secure your agents at scale with Microsoft Agent 365 guidance.
• Read a guide to governance and security for AI agents at your organization.
• Check out this detailed guide to our governance process for the internal rollout of Microsoft 365 Copilot.  
• Explore ways to establish responsible AI policies for agents across the organization.  
• Find out how a data council is powering our unified data strategy at Microsoft.

Try it out

Get started building and managing agents at your company with Microsoft Agent 365.

The post Governing AI agents at scale: Lessons from our journey at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

But in practice, the technical side of transformation is only part of the story. The missing piece is us humans.

When we encounter these kinds of challenges internally at Microsoft, we think of ourselves as “Customer Zero.” We roll out our technology across our own organization first, learning what works and what doesn’t in real time and at scale so we can pass our lessons on to you.

“After an early wave of enthusiasm for Copilot, adoption declined. People questioned whether AI was relevant to their role, worried about what it might mean for their work, and disengaged when the change they experienced didn’t match the change they imagined.”

Daniel Bertrand, senior director, AI Transformation Office

We learned valuable lessons about AI adoption and sustainable change when we deployed Microsoft 365 Copilot across our Microsoft Commercial organization, one of the company’s largest sales and service organizations. What we observed led us to reset our strategy and build a more human-centered process for deploying and driving adoption of our AI technology.

Driving AI adoption with role relevance and daily habits

Here on the Customer Zero team in Microsoft Customer and Partner Solutions (MCAPS), our 60,000-employee strong sales organization, we saw that getting access to Copilot didn’t automatically result in widespread AI adoption.

“After an early wave of enthusiasm for Copilot, adoption declined,” says Daniel Bertrand, a senior director on the AI Transformation Office team in MCAPS. “People questioned whether AI was relevant to their role, worried about what it might mean for their work, and disengaged when the change they experienced didn’t match the change they imagined.”

Initially, people used Copilot like a search engine and expected it to make work go away. When that didn’t happen automatically, they didn’t know how to approach prompting the AI, or how to create value with it. The gap between access and know‑how is where adoption slowed.

“I knew from experience that people prefer to hear from—and learn alongside—those closest to their day-to-day work, to build trust and confidence.”

Susan Neece Robien, senior director of adoption and change, AI Transformation Office

We reframed the problem from “How do we scale the technology?” to, “What does this change feel like for people doing the work every day?”

By talking to people in our larger organization about why they were reluctant to work with Copilot, we discovered the adoption barrier was less about the technology being available and more about whether people trusted it, understood how it fit their role, and felt confident enough to build new habits around it.

The ‘Adoption-in-a-Box’ approach

After these conversations, we changed our strategy across the board.

“I knew from experience that people prefer to hear from—and learn alongside—those closest to their day‑to‑day work, to build trust and confidence,” says Susan Neece Robien, a senior director of adoption and change on the AI Transformation Office team. “That led me to conceptualize Adoption‑in‑a‑Box—a repeatable approach that combines behavior‑change guidance, peer influence, habit‑forming activities, and light gamification so people can experiment with AI in a non‑threatening way and build confidence over time.”

We rolled out the Adoption-in-a-Box concept across the team in the following ways:

• Emphasized visible leadership support: We circulated videos and “day in the life” PowerPoint 1-pagers of how our leaders were using Copilot.
• Formed a community of early adopters: They becamepeer champions for adoption, evangelizing best practices and leading workshops.
• Created a Role Hub: The hub contained practical, role-specific learning about how to use Copilot rather than doing high-level general trainings.
• Ran prompt campaigns: To get our team started with habitually using AI in their daily roles, we ran prompt campaigns to make prompt learning accessible and actionable.
• Created the Copilot Cup: We encouraged friendly competitions with leadership support. We also ran hackathons and prompt-based scavenger hunts to gamify learning about and using the AI for our team.
• Created ongoing measurement mechanisms: We stood up dashboards with monthly, weekly, and daily average usage reports. We also ran quarterly surveys to track sentiment around AI adoption on the team.

After our initial success with Adoption-in-a-Box, we scaled it to adoption leads, who brought the model to life within their teams.

When people feel safe in experimenting with AI and incorporating it into their day-to-day work, that’s when it provides real value for the organization and the individual. We’ve learned that sustainable, scalable AI transformation succeeds when we put people first.

Key takeaways

If you’re wondering how to encourage your own team to adopt new AI technology into their workflows, you can learn from our experience:

• Prioritize visible leadership participation. Leaders set the tone of any transformation, and AI adoption is no exception.
• Roll out for role relevance. Specificity is the key here: How does AI relate to each person’s individual role? If the tool provides value and saves time, people will incorporate it into their workflow.
• Establishing habits is crucial. Sustainable adoption means people use the tool on a daily basis in the natural flow of their work. Give them low-friction opportunities to learn the ropes.
• Encourage peer-to-peer experimentation. Early adopters can be a valuable resource for showing others the way. Lowering the stakes by having a peer guide employees in a workshop or one-on-one can take the pressure off as they experiment with the tech.

Try it out

Test drive an AI-assisted workflow of your own with Microsoft 365 Copilot to see how agentic AI can transform your team.

Related links

• Discover the five lessons we learned about how to make AI stick for sellers during our Copilot rollout.
• Check out our full guide describing how we deployed and drove adoption of Microsoft 365 Copilot across our global organization.
• Read about our internal change management strategy for Copilot and how it helps us drive the future of work.
• Learn how the creation of a Copilot Expo propelled AI usage at Microsoft.
• See our seven tips for driving Copilot adoption with a virtual skilling event.
• Discover how one Microsoft Digital employee powers her typical workday using Copilot.

The post Staying human: How we’re using AI to transform the sales experience at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

These innovations have come in many different forms across every group and function at the company. It’s impossible to capture them all in a single concept or story, but one of the ways that we’ve activated the power of AI for our workforce is Work IQ.

Work IQ isn’t a product.

It’s a shared intelligence layer that enables Microsoft 365 Copilot and AI agents to reason over and understand your organization’s work data, then use that context to generate more relevant responses and actions. This means that the entire Microsoft Graph—including rich unstructured data from your Teams chats and meetings, Outlook emails, Word documents, PowerPoint presentations, and more—is now part of your AI-powered work experience.

“It’s not really a brand-new capability, but more an evolution of what users already know, which is access to the grounding data in their Microsoft tenant. The difference is that Work IQ adds an additional layer to provide more context, allowing for richer and more relevant results.”

Aisha Hasan, principal product manager, Microsoft Digital

Work IQ enables Copilot to not only tailor answers to your role and responsibilities, but also to understand who your most frequent collaborators are, comprehend details about your latest projects, surface deliverables and deadlines, and intuit next steps. Additionally, Work IQ makes it easy for any AI agent to take advantage of the same rich enterprise data to return and act on more contextual results.

“It’s not really a brand-new capability, but more an evolution of what users already know, which is access to the grounding data in their Microsoft tenant,” says Aisha Hasan, a principal product manager in Microsoft Digital. “The difference is that Work IQ adds an additional layer to provide more context, allowing for richer and more relevant results.”

At Microsoft Digital, the company’s IT organization, we’ve seen firsthand how this intelligence layer is accelerating employee adoption of Copilot and agentic AI as outputs become more perceptive and valuable. Work IQ is a foundational step toward a future where AI has moved beyond isolated assistance and become a trusted professional helper—sometimes described as a digital colleague—that carries out tasks and anticipates needs in every aspect of daily work.

How Work IQ impacts everyday work

One of the most instructive aspects of Work IQ’s impact across our organization is that it happened without a traditional deployment. There was no enablement event for employees or operational playbook distributed to administrators. It didn’t require any changes to the application interfaces. Yet over time, our employee Copilot interactions improved in measurable ways.

“There was a period where we weren’t adding new content to Copilot, and yet I noticed our metrics for quality and user satisfaction kept going up. Why was that? It was because of all these incremental improvements that we refer to as Work IQ.”

Dodd Willingham, principal product manager, Microsoft Digital

This was a direct consequence of introducing a shared intelligence layer into a Microsoft environment that was already rich in work signals. Those work signals are extremely valuable data that was difficult to extract meaning from before the advent of AI. As the technology advanced, we could take full advantage of this data to inform and improve agentic responses.

As Customer Zero for the company, Microsoft Digital was at the forefront of measuring the impact of Work IQ. Our employees saw significant gains in relevance, grounding, and answer coherence in Copilot that were visible in the metrics, even during times when the underlying content remained relatively static. That’s the Work IQ difference.

“There was a period where we weren’t adding new content to Copilot, and yet I noticed our metrics for quality and user satisfaction kept going up,” says Dodd Willingham, a principal product manager in Microsoft Digital. “Why was that? It was because of all these incremental improvements that we refer to as Work IQ.”

At a systems level, Work IQ reasons across a broad cross-section of Microsoft 365 data, including:

• Outlook email content, thread structure, and interaction patterns
• Teams chats, channels, and meeting transcripts
• Calendar events and scheduling metadata
• Documents and files across Word, PowerPoint, Excel, OneDrive, and SharePoint
• Signals that show who collaborates with whom, how often, and in what context

Work IQ can also access structured data in tools like Dynamics 365, Power BI, Power Apps, and other business applications. The ability to extract context and interpret structured and unstructured data in a unified intelligence layer is the reason why Work IQ is making such a difference for our employees.

Making Outlook better

Outlook provides a useful lens on how Work IQ functions because it’s both heavily used by our employees and a highly contextual tool. Although the application hasn’t outwardly changed, the way Copilot interacts with inbox and calendar data has evolved, in part due to richer context provided by Work IQ.

“The intelligence works behind the scenes as you use Outlook. Your inbox just gradually feels more relevant. Outlook adapts to your work patterns, making your inbox feel more like an assistant, instead of a filing cabinet of communications.”

Matthew Marzynski, principal product manager, core experiences, Microsoft Digital

Now when you turn to Copilot in Outlook to summarize email threads, it can surface decision points, action owners, and unresolved issues. Instead of treating email as a collection of messages and providing rote summaries, Copilot perceives it as a record of decisions and commitments over time.

Calendar-related experiences are on a similar trajectory. Meeting preparation and follow‑up suggestions are now drawing on prior interactions with the same participants, relevant documents that were previously shared, and historical patterns around similar meetings.

Work IQ isn’t rule-based automation layered on top of Outlook. Users aren’t configuring new filters or workflows. Instead, the system is adapting based on observed patterns, meaning user behavior can remain the same while output quality improves

“The intelligence works behind the scenes as you use Outlook,” says Matthew Marzynski, a principal product manager for core experiences in Microsoft Digital. “Your inbox just gradually feels more relevant. Outlook adapts to your work patterns, making your inbox feel more like an assistant, instead of a filing cabinet of communications.”

Applying persistent memory

Another important aspect of Work IQ is the ability to retain persistent memory of each employee’s role, responsibilities, and work context. Copilot and other agents no longer need to be continually prompted with details about who the user is and what they’re working on. It learns that information and remembers it going forward.

This feature, also called persistent understanding, builds trust and increases efficiency each time an employee turns to AI for help with their work. AI systems that depend on manual context-setting don’t scale well across large organizations, which we at Microsoft Digital learned as we tested and deployed Copilot across the company.

“The user no longer has to tell the agent, ‘I work in this area, so please tailor your response to that’ every time,” says Anishkumar Ramakrishnan, a principal PM manager in Microsoft Digital. “With Work IQ, Copilot and agents recall it going forward. It remembers things that the user doesn’t even remember themselves about their past work and actions. This is the promise of intelligent context.”

From answers to action: Work IQ and AI agents

As organizations move toward integrating AI agents into all aspects of their day-to-day work, the value of Work IQ increases. Any agent—not just a general-purpose agent like Copilot—that can interpret vast amounts of your unstructured work data is going to produce results that are far more relevant than one that simply draws on general knowledge about a topic or process.

“Before, a builder had to go connector by connector and be very prescriptive—calendar read, email read, meeting access—just to build an agent. Now they can simply point the agent to Work IQ, and it gains contextual access across mail, calendar, meetings, and files through a single connector (API or MCP server).”

Naveen Jangir, principal architect, Microsoft Digital

Early agent implementations relied on narrower task-specific access to data. For each agent, a developer would have to build connections to a particular document library, mailbox, or set of calendar data. Each connection required separate consent and management, which generally resulted in a more limited scope.

But with Work IQ, builders can create agents using Microsoft Copilot Studio or other development platforms (such as Microsoft Foundry) that use APIs or Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers to connect to Microsoft Graph data. This enables them to bring the full power of enterprise data to any agentic creation, not just Microsoft 365 agents.

“Before, a builder had to go connector by connector and be very prescriptive—calendar read, email read, meeting access—just to build an agent,” says Naveen Jangir, a principal architect in Microsoft Digital. “Now they can simply point the agent to Work IQ, and it gains contextual access across mail, calendar, meetings, and files through a single connector (API or MCP server).”

This shift doesn’t just simplify agent development—it fundamentally expands what agents are capable of. Instead of operating within narrow, predefined tasks, agents can now reason across a broader work context to deliver better outcomes. For example, an agent supporting a project manager can surface relevant email threads, identify key stakeholders from meeting activity, reference the latest project documents, and highlight upcoming deadlines—all within a single interaction.

Intelligence without bypassing governance

From a governance perspective, Work IQ doesn’t introduce a new security model. Instead, it operates entirely within the existing Microsoft 365 data protection boundaries that our company and our customers already rely on.

The intelligence layer can access this enterprise data, but it does so while honoring permissions, sensitivity labels, access policies, and compliance controls defined at the source. Work IQ can only surface or act on information that the user—or an agent identity acting on the user’s behalf—is already authorized to access.

This inheritance model is intentional. Governance remains rooted in the data layer, not in the AI layer. Work IQ respects established controls such as identity‑based access and tenant policies, which means agents are generally given less access than human users.

“An agent user only gets access to what is explicitly shared with it,” Jangir says. “Human users typically have broader default access. By design in Work IQ, agents can usually see less than people, not more.”

For IT and security teams, this places the emphasis squarely on data discipline and identity controls, which are complementary security layers. Work IQ amplifies the value of well‑governed data and exposes weaknesses where governance is inconsistent. Admins remain in control of access and can turn off APIs and MCP server connections if they want to limit an agent’s data access.

Work IQ, Fabric IQ, and Foundry IQ

As we’ve scaled up Copilot and agentic AI internally, one lesson has become clear: Intelligence works best when it’s part of a layered infrastructure rather than working on its own.

That’s why Work IQ is just one context layer we’re using at Microsoft. We’ve also developed Fabric IQ and Foundry IQ, which are complementary layers in our overall data strategy. Each of these addresses a different aspect of enterprise intelligence.

The three layers serve distinct but connected purposes:

• Work IQ focuses on unstructured productivity data, helping AI understand how people work across email, meetings, documents, and collaboration signals.
• Fabric IQ applies similar reasoning to analytical and structured data, adding context and explanation to metrics, trends, KPIs, and other business signals.
• Foundry IQ provides the foundation for builders to create agents that draw from both worlds, connecting intelligence across Microsoft 365, analytics platforms, and line‑of‑business systems.

Taken together, these layers also contribute to something deeper: the emergence of a shared business ontology. By extracting and aligning business entities—such as people, projects, and processes—from both structured data in Fabric IQ and the unstructured signals captured by Work IQ, the system perceives meaningful connections that previously were hidden. This unified understanding allows agents to reason across domains with greater precision, linking metrics to the real work and making insights more actionable in context.

This architecture matters because it removes artificial seams. Agents shouldn’t need to shift between separate contexts for work content, enterprise data, or application logic. The IQ layers make it possible to deliver a single agentic experience that reasons consistently, applies governance uniformly, and moves with users across environments. Just as importantly, the same controls—identity, permissions, labeling, and policy—flow through each layer, keeping trust intact as capability expands.

At Microsoft, Work IQ and the other context layers are helping Copilot and agents to accelerate beyond AI experimentation. They are now vital operational tools that make everyone more productive across the global enterprise. Context and intelligence in agentic tools are a key part of the future of work, at Microsoft and for our customers as well.

Key takeaways

Here are some things to keep in mind as you prepare your own organization to take full advantage of Work IQ:

• Treat the technology as infrastructure, not a feature. We didn’t formally roll out Work IQ. Its value emerged gradually as it improved Copilot responses and as our agent builders could more easily tap into unstructured enterprise data.
• Expect improvements in AI quality without changes to your data. We saw measurable gains in relevance and user satisfaction even when underlying content remained the same, driven by better contextual reasoning across existing work signals.
• Focus on how employees work, not just what content exists. Work IQ improves AI outcomes by connecting people, relationships, and activity patterns, resulting in more actionable and grounded responses.
• Use Work IQ to move from assistance to action with agents. By giving agents access to contextual enterprise data through a unified layer, we enabled more automated workflows without requiring developers to manage dozens of connectors manually.
• Invest in data governance early to maximize AI value. Because Work IQ inherits permissions and policies from the data layer, its effectiveness—and safety—relies on clear labeling, intentional access design, and disciplined data management.
• Enable self-service collaboration data so it’s available for Work IQ. WorkIQ can only ground on data that is both available and not purposefully hidden. We make sure that our meetings are AI-enabled (and often recorded) and allow self-service in Teams and SharePoint, so the data is not hidden from Work IQ.
• Build toward a unified intelligence model across work and data. Combining Work IQ with Fabric IQ and Foundry IQ means agents can operate seamlessly across different kinds of data and incorporate more intelligence into their output and actions.

Try it out

Get a closer look at Work IQ.

Related links

• Check out how we’re embracing this agentic moment at Microsoft.
• Explore a Microsoft Learn article for more technical details about how Work IQ works.
• Learn how to get started building agents with Microsoft tools.
• Discover our detailed guide on how we deploy AI agents internally at Microsoft.
• Read an IT playbook for the AI era and learn how we’re becoming a Frontier Firm at Microsoft.
• See how we’re using Model Context Protocol security and governance to protect AI conversations at Microsoft.

The post How Work IQ is supercharging our AI usage at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

At Microsoft, we’ve put that potential into action by building the Employee Self-Service Agent, a centralized “front door” for employee support inquiries on all things Microsoft. Whether the question is related to an IT, human resources (HR), or campus services-related challenge, this agentic solution delivers geographically relevant, role-specific content on demand.

Our agent was rolled out in stages to our global workforce, as we continually added topic categories, features, and geographic availability. It eventually reached our entire workforce—more than 300,000 employees and vendors in 103 countries and regions—before being publicly released last November.

Our team in Microsoft Digital—the company’s IT organization—played a pivotal role in our global rollout, working closely with the product team and providing valuable feedback throughout development. It’s all part of our Customer Zero philosophy here at the company.

The agent proved its value early, piloting in large, primarily English-speaking regions—including Canada, India, the UK, and the US—and reaching more than half of our global workforce. But we wanted to raise the bar, so we turned to the rest of Europe.

The next chapter in the rollout was the Europe North region, which brought in 21 countries that are home to a wide variety of languages, cultures, country-specific HR policies, and nuanced IT support requirements.

“For the Employee Self‑Service Agent to work in Europe North, we had to listen locally to understand each country’s realities and respect those differences, rather than forcing a single global approach.”

Allan Hvass, director, Employee Experience in Europe North, Microsoft Digital

However, early deployments in smaller markets in the region revealed that when local content for a specific geography was missing, the agent sometimes defaulted to policies related to the US or other unrelated countries. Sensitive HR scenarios and strict country-level rules increased the complexity and resulting challenges.

Our team in Microsoft Digital met the challenge by working through front‑end field adoption and back‑end product updates to successfully land the Employee Self-Service Agent in Europe North’s small and midsize countries. This included adapting the product to distinct local realities in each country.

“For the Employee Self‑Service Agent to work in Europe North, we had to listen locally to understand each country’s realities and respect those differences, rather than forcing a single global approach,” says Allan Hvass, director for Employee Experience in the Europe North region of Microsoft Digital.

Mobilizing field representatives

To help with the tricky aspects of driving local adoption of  the Employee Self-Service Agent, our team in Microsoft Digital formed an adoption advisory team. The team included leadership representatives from all major countries and business divisions.

The group established on‑the‑ground field representatives to create better communications channels with the Europe North countries. This helped us learn what was and wasn’t working locally while we extended support for neighboring countries and kept excitement around the agent alive.

“I encouraged my colleagues to use the agent, and then to tell customers about their experience,” Rusen says. “A story grounded in real use is much more powerful and authentic than any slide deck.”

Daniel Rusen, sales enablement and operations leader, Europe North

Because the team had already been communicating about the agent internally, including hosting all-hands meetings to spark early usage, we were able to collect thousands of instances of employee feedback. Key themes surfaced, including policy accuracy by country, quality of language, and IT support variance by market.

Daniel Rusen, a sales enablement and operations leader for Europe North, served as one of the field representatives. He helped the advisory team close the loop between the field and the core project by highlighting the language and local relevancy issues that were reported. He also became an evangelist for the agent, encouraging other sales executives to use the tool and experience it first-hand.

“I encouraged my colleagues to use the agent, and then to tell customers about their experience,” Rusen says. “A story grounded in real use is much more powerful and authentic than any slide deck.”

Driving adoption with contextual experiences

To support the rollout of the Employee Self-Service Agent across Europe North, we designed an adoption approach aligned with regional priorities and local ways of working.

We focused on making the value of the agent immediately tangible. Through Microsoft Viva Engage communications, we connected the agent directly to Europe North business goals and highlighted the most relevant, high-impact scenarios—helping employees quickly recognize when the agent was the right “front door” for their support needs.

“Adoption is not about pushing a tool, it’s about helping people recognize, in their own context, when it truly makes their day easier. By focusing on relevant scenarios, simple communication, and hands-on experiences, we made the Employee Self-Service Agent useful from the start.”

Edith Dubuisson, senior business program manager, Employee Experience in Europe North, Microsoft Digital

To avoid overwhelming users, we prioritized simple, focused communication formats. For example, an Advent calendar campaign combined the agent with Copilot capabilities, enabling employees to discover one practical, actionable use case at a time.

In parallel, we hosted targeted readiness sessions to demonstrate key end-to-end scenarios and share practical tips and best practices. This ensured employees not only understood the value of the agent, but also felt confident using it from day one—creating a strong and positive first experience.

“Adoption is not about pushing a tool, it’s about helping people recognize, in their own context, when it truly makes their day easier,” says Edith Dubuisson, a senior business program manager in Microsoft Digital. “By focusing on relevant scenarios, simple communication, and hands-on experiences, we made the Employee Self-Service Agent useful from the start.”

Fine-tuning the agent

Built in Copilot Studio, the Employee Self-Service Agent works on global, regional, and area levels to make sure that users receive the content that corresponds to their geographical location and preferred language.

The Microsoft Global Support Services group manages the agent capability and improvements, driven by a strong partnership with internal engineering teams. The team triaged feedback and partnered with the product group to tag accurate policies and knowledge by country, and to tune agent behavior and guardrails for localized content. They prioritized quick fixes and high-impact content gaps.

Updating the Employee Self-Service Agent to fix content mismatches in Europe North wasn’t about tweaking the AI in isolation. Instead, we needed to overhaul the content that the agent relies on.

“Instead of treating mismatches as failures alone, we used them as signals to improve the underlying content—revising articles, correcting categorization, and closing gaps in coverage. Over time, this combination of tightly scoped data sources, country-level tagging, and ongoing content curation turned the agent into a far more reliable assistant.”

David Finney, director, IT Service Management, Microsoft Digital

The team “grounded” the agent in a set of trusted, IT-approved sources: About 250,000 vetted knowledge base articles and 15-20 different internal SharePoint sites containing policies, guidelines, how-to articles, and related information.

Then they tackled regional nuances, one of the biggest drivers of content mismatches (when a user gets a reply based on content that doesn’t match their country or region). The team tagged content by geography (such as UK-only or Romania-only), so the agent would be fed the correct information for that geographic area.

The process of fixing mismatches also yielded insights.

David Finney, a director of IT Service Management in Microsoft Digital, frames the process as a clear lesson: AI is only as good as the content behind it, so the real work is often on the back end.

“Instead of treating mismatches as failures alone, we used them as signals to improve the underlying content—revising articles, correcting categorization, and closing gaps in coverage,” Finney says. “Over time, this combination of tightly scoped data sources, country‑level tagging, and ongoing content curation turned the agent into a far more reliable assistant.”

Impact and results

The Global Support team added a continuous feedback loop to keep the agent’s content aligned with reality. Users can flag low-quality and inaccurate answers directly through the agent interface. That data flows to a dedicated knowledge management team, creating an efficient pipeline for feedback to inform back‑end fixes and product improvements.

“We’re measuring success by a reduction in tickets, but that’s based on the user having a better experience using the Employee Self-Service Agent versus calling our global help desk and talking to a person. We can only be truly successful if we are creating a better experience for our users.”

Anders Jepsen, director, Field IT Management, Microsoft Digital

Today, the Employee Self-Service Agent’s metrics are moving in the right direction.

The team is optimistic as the Global Support Services data shows agent activity steadily increasing after it officially went live last October, as shown in the following image. At the same time, usage of Legacy Bot (an existing digital support chatbot) decreased, along with support interactions via phone, email, and web.

This data suggests the agent is meeting its ultimate goal: To provide users with an improved support experience, including better first‑touch answers that build employee confidence and yield faster issue resolution. This reduces escalation to human-run support channels and decreases the volume of tickets our employees have to create.

“We’re measuring success by a reduction in tickets, but that’s based on the user having a better experience using the Employee Self-Service Agent versus calling our global help desk and talking to a person,” says Anders Jepsen, a director of Field IT Management in Microsoft Digital. “We can only be truly successful if we are creating a better experience for our users.”

What’s next for self-service support

Our experience deploying the Employee Self-Service Agent in Europe North has allowed us to create a playbook for other small and midsize countries in similar situations, including dealing with multiple languages and specific regional policies.

“Our long-term ambition is to reduce our human-led support tickets by 40 percent. In some areas, like Europe North, we are already taking a significant step toward that.”

Trent Berghofer, general manager, Microsoft Digital Modern Support

The agent now serves as both a self-service tool and the first contact point for employee questions. It doesn’t completely remove humans from support, because if that first point of contact doesn’t resolve the IT issue, a team of humans is available to help.

In the end, the fewer support tickets that are opened, the more time employees can have back for higher-value tasks.

“Our long-term ambition is to reduce our human-led support tickets by 40 percent,” says Trent Berghofer, a general manager in Microsoft Digital Modern Support. “In some areas, like Europe North, we are already taking a significant step toward that.”

The Employee Self-Service Agent is a great example of using the power of AI to increase employee productivity and efficiency, as they access highly curated support through the tool on demand. It fits in with our company’s overall strategic efforts to evolve into an AI-driven Frontier Firm.

“The agent brings IT, HR, and facilities together in one place,” Dubuisson says. “It’s not just a Q&A bot. It gives you information, guides you, and even holds your hand through troubleshooting. The agent tells you what to do and can even do it for you. It standardizes, simplifies, and still lets you chat with someone or get a call back when you need it.”

Key takeaways

Here are steps organizations can take today to implement an AI-powered employee support hub:

• Evaluate your employee support systems. Assess whether employees have a single, trusted “front door” for support issues, or if your organization’s support is still fragmented across different tools.
• Audit local policy coverage in your AI solutions. Identify where tools may be defaulting to global or geographically incorrect content–especially in regions with multiple countries or languages–to validate accuracy and boost trust.
• Pilot localized AI support efforts in a diversified region. Engage regional HR, IT, and field adoption teams early on to make sure that AI experiences reflect real, country-specific employee needs.

Try it out

Learn all about the Employee Self-Service Agent.

Related links

• Check out our in-depth guide to deploying the Employee Self-Service Agent.
• See how we’re accelerating support services at Microsoft with the Employee Self-Service Agent.
• Read about how the agent improves campus and facilities-related support at Microsoft.
• Explore Microsoft Learn content about the Employee Self-Service Agent.
• Watch a Microsoft Ignite Session about the Employee Self-Service Agent.

The post Transforming IT support across Microsoft with the Employee Self-Service Agent appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

On the other: A deep responsibility to protect the enterprise—its data, employees, customers, and regulatory posture—at a time when AI systems are evolving faster than traditional governance models were designed to handle.

“In the era of AI, delaying deployment does not eliminate risk—it often increases it. We need to work even faster to enable our business with AI, while simultaneously protecting our enterprise.”

Brian Fielder, vice president, Microsoft Digital

For CIOs, CDOs, and technology leaders across industries, this is no longer a philosophical debate, it’s an operating reality. How do you accelerate AI‑driven transformation without increasing enterprise risk? And critically, how do you innovate earlier, when learning is most valuable, without sacrificing trust?

At Microsoft, we’re living this tension firsthand, and our experience has led us to clear conclusions.

“In the era of AI, delaying deployment does not eliminate risk—it often increases it,” says Brian Fielder, vice president of Microsoft Digital. “We need to work even faster to enable our business with AI, while simultaneously protecting our enterprise.”

Mastering the delicate balance between risk avoidance and AI-fueled innovation is the new challenge for technology leaders globally. This insight has fundamentally reshaped how we approach release management, AI adoption, and enterprise governance at Microsoft. We call this approach Fast Train, and it has become a core part of how we operate as a Frontier Firm—one that learns early, under control—enabling capabilities that give our employees an edge while carefully balancing enterprise risk.

Rethinking release management for the AI era

Traditional release management was designed for a different world.

“While we’ve never been as risk‑averse as some of our customers, our focus is to always be risk‑aware. When products attest to risk upfront and take ownership at design time, they’re empowered to deploy at full speed—without waiting in a backlog of exceptions.”

B. Ganti, principal architect, Microsoft Digital

Stage‑gated approvals, quarterly releases, and broad “wait until it’s safe” models worked when change was linear, infrequent, and predictable. But AI changes the equation. Models evolve continuously. Capabilities improve weekly. User behavior, as well as risks, emerge dynamically in production.

In this environment, waiting for certainty before deploying often means learning too late.

As Customer Zero for so many of Microsoft’s enterprise products, Microsoft Digital has long been risk aware, with greater tolerance for risk than some of our customers. However, with Fast Train we’re moving at greater speed in low-risk situations.

“While we’ve never been as risk‑averse as some of our customers, our focus is to always be risk‑aware,” says B. Ganti, a principal architect in Microsoft Digital. “When products attest to risk upfront and take ownership at design time, they’re empowered to deploy at full speed—without waiting in a backlog of exceptions.”

Legacy models concentrate exposure until a global rollout, when:

• Dependency has already hardened
• Mitigation options are limited
• The blast radius is at its largest

Frontier organizations take a different approach. They treat release management not as a gate, but as an adaptive operating system—one designed to surface signal early, while controls still matter.

While you won’t have access to Microsoft solutions at design time, these same principles are useful as you consider how to “shift left” when you build or acquire new digital capabilities in your environment. Design time in this context might be early visibility of new features or capabilities in the Microsoft 365 Message Center. Applying a Fast train mentality can help you to quickly identify trusted updates to bring into your environment immediately versus those that might require deeper assessment prior to deployment.

At Microsoft, that shift reframed a core question:

Not “How do we safely deploy change at scale?”, but instead “How do we learn earlier, safely, and continuously?”

Fast Train: Learning early, at enterprise scale

Fast Train is not a shortcut around governance. It is Microsoft’s primary early‑Frontier deployment model for low‑ and medium‑risk innovation.

Under Fast Train, eligible capabilities are deployed earlier—often globally—inside Microsoft’s own enterprise environment, under explicit guardrails. This allows product teams to learn from real usage patterns, real data flows, and real operational behavior before expectations harden and dependencies scale.

Critically, Fast Train operates on a simple principle: speed should align to risk, not to organizational inertia.

Instead of forcing every capability down the slowest possible path, Fast Train uses risk‑adaptive deployment shapes:

• Default‑on Frontier deployment for lower‑risk capabilities
• Admin‑gated Frontier deployment for higher‑impact or tenant‑sensitive scenarios
• Standard or deferred release only where risk truly demands it

In all cases, innovation moves forward. What changes is how it is enabled, not whether it progresses at all.

Why early deployment can reduce risk

From a security and compliance perspective, this may sound counterintuitive. Isn’t early deployment riskier?

In practice, we’ve observed the opposite. The most dangerous moment for an enterprise system is not early exposure, it’s late discovery. Waiting until adoption is widespread before learning how a capability behaves:

• Reduces mitigation options
• Expands blast radius
• Compresses response timelines under regulatory or customer pressure

“The question isn’t how to eliminate risk entirely—it’s where we’re willing to be uncomfortable, so our employees don’t work around IT.”

David Johnson, principal tenant architect, Microsoft Digital

By contrast, Frontier deployment reverses this risk profile. Fast Train allows Microsoft to:

• Surface data flow issues and edge cases earlier
• Tune controls before dependencies harden
• Establish clear accountability for rollback, disablement, and remediation

This is risk‑aware innovation, not risk‑blind speed. Guardrails are built in and not bolted on after the fact.

Governance that adapts instead of blocks

One of the most significant shifts Fast Train enabled was a change in how governance participates in innovation.

“Fast Train is fundamentally a risk-taking exercise—but it’s a deliberate one,” says David Johnson, principal tenant architect in Microsoft Digital. “The question isn’t how to eliminate risk entirely—it’s where we’re willing to be uncomfortable, so our employees don’t work around IT. If the platform honors our non‑negotiables—security, compliance, discovery—then we don’t need to over‑rotate on every new feature built on top of it.”

Traditional models treat governance as a final checkpoint. Governance is an episodic approval that happens after most key decisions are already made. Frontier models embed governance earlier and continuously, focusing attention where it matters most.

“Innovation doesn’t have to be slowed down by governance,” Ganti says. “By shifting risk consideration to design time, we remove friction at the point of deployment—so teams can move straight onto the Fast Train, with no toll booths, no gates, and no delays.”

Under Fast Train:

• Low‑risk change moves quickly under defined boundaries
• Higher‑impact capabilities shift to choice‑based enablement
• Deep governance review is reserved for material risk events like new data flows, boundary changes, or regulatory impact

This keeps governance focused, effective, and credible while avoiding the trap of over‑governing low‑risk change.

Just as importantly, Fast Train makes our Microsoft product teams explicitly accountable. Ownership for quality, rollback, and remediation sits with the teams shipping the capability, not with downstream review bodies. That means product teams have an incentive to build features that meet our Fast Train criteria, increasing the chance that our customers can also deploy new capabilities more quickly and with less risk.

Admin‑gated does not mean anti‑Frontier

A common misconception is that admin‑gated or choice‑based deployment is inherently slower or less innovative. Our experience in Microsoft Digital suggests the opposite.

Admin‑gated Frontier deployments are not a retreat from innovation. They are a different exposure shape for the same learning objective. We use them when impact is higher and explicit tenant choice matters.

In both default‑on and admin‑gated Frontier deployment:

• Capabilities reach real users early
• Deployment is global
• Learning loops start before broad GA expectations harden

The distinction is not speed. It’s enablement mechanics, informed by the risk profile of the deployment.

Becoming a Frontier Firm is a maturity journey

Frontier behavior is a maturity that advances over time.

“Our focus is evolving to put greater focus on speed and enablement. Fast Train lets governance teams focus on truly high‑risk scenarios while giving product teams the guidance and tools they need upfront so they can move faster with confidence.”

Priya Chebiyam, principal product manager, Microsoft Digital

In Microsoft Digital, we measure ourselves against a Frontier Firm capability maturity model, which reflects how organizations evolve from risk averse release models toward risk aware, signal driven operations. Our internal rubric describes 5 stages of enterprise maturity:

Frontier Firm capability maturity model

“Our focus is evolving to put greater focus on speed and enablement,” says Priya Chebiyam, principal product manager in Microsoft Digital. “Fast Train lets governance teams focus on truly high‑risk scenarios while giving product teams the guidance and tools they need upfront so they can move faster with confidence.”

Today, we assess ourselves in the Emerging Frontier stage, operating Fast Train broadly while investing to further institutionalize continuous governance, telemetry, and accountability. A critical step in that journey has been onboarding Microsoft 365 Copilot and first‑party agents into the Fast Train operating model to expand early signal and tighten ownership.

The lesson for customers isn’t to copy Microsoft’s internal processes, but to adopt the pattern:

• Define where early learning is safe through your own criteria—these are effectively your organizational “guardrails”
• Make enablement choices explicit
• Require ownership and rollback readiness
• Let real‑world signal and not assumptions drive your decisions

Trust and innovation advance together

At Microsoft, Fast Train has reinforced a simple truth: speed, trust, and compliance are not tradeoffs. They are outcomes of a risk‑adaptive operating model.

“Fast Train is built on a simple principle: ship fast when it’s safe, and slow down only when it’s necessary,” Chebiyam says. “We empower feature owners to self‑attest low‑risk features using clear criteria, while still protecting security, privacy, compliance, and regulatory requirements.”

By learning earlier—under control—organizations can reduce late‑stage surprises, accelerate transformation, and engage partners and stakeholders from a position of evidence rather than theory.

“We will be deploying earlier under the right guardrails so we can understand real world behavior, build the right controls, and earn customer trust through evidence, not assumptions. Our responsibility is not to slow innovation down, but to enable it safely—at the speed our customers and the market demand.”

Aleš Holeček, chief architect and corporate vice president, Microsoft Security

In the AI era, the greatest enterprise risk isn’t moving too fast—it’s learning too slow.  Fast Train reflects a shift from risk avoidance to risk awareness and near real-time assessment.

“We will be deploying earlier under the right guardrails so we can understand real‑world behavior, build the right controls, and earn customer trust through evidence, not assumptions,” says Aleš Holeček, chief architect and corporate vice president in Microsoft Security. “Our responsibility is not to slow innovation down, but to enable it safely—at the speed our customers and the market demand.”

Frontier firms don’t move fast despite risk. They move fast because risk is understood, bounded, and actively managed.

Key takeaways

For CIOs, CDOs, and technology leaders ready to accelerate AI adoption while minimizing risk, Microsoft Digital’s experience suggests five practical actions you can take today:

• Treat early deployment as a risk‑reduction strategy. Surface issues earlier when mitigation options are still available, instead of discovering them after global dependency sets in.
• Establish a clear Frontier cohort. Identify a workload, geography, or business unit where early learning is safe, intentional, and governed and be intentional in empowering that cohort.
• Separate innovation speed from enablement mechanics. Use default‑on deployment for low‑risk capabilities and admin‑gated choice for higher‑impact scenarios without slowing learning velocity.
• Make governance continuous, not episodic. Shift governance left by embedding it earlier with monitoring, attestation, and clear escalation triggers rather than relying on late‑stage gates.
• Require explicit ownership and rollback readiness. Ensure every deployed capability has a named owner, a defined rollback path, and continuous telemetry to support fast correction.

Try it out

Looking to accelerate your journey to the Frontier? Try Microsoft Agent 365 in your company.

Related links

• Check out our IT playbook for becoming a Frontier Firm.
• Read more about the agentic future that we’re embracing at Microsoft.
• Discover our readiness guide for deploying AI agents, based on our own company’s experience.
• Learn how we’re transforming our enterprise IT operations with AI at scale.
• Explore our five-step guide to enterprise AI maturity for IT leaders.

We’d like to hear from you!

• Want more information? Email us and include a link to this story and we’ll get back to you.

The post Fast Train to the AI Frontier: Balancing risk and innovation in the era of AI at Microsoft appeared first on Inside Track Blog.

Yonatan Zunger, CVP and deputy CISO for Microsoft, suggests focusing exclusively on hardening a piece of software to security threats may make it difficult to use and introduce a new risk when users get frustrated and try to bypass controls. This is why engineers need to consider not just individual components but how they work together to maintain productivity.

“Think of every system as a socio-technical system containing many parts, and all of them working together in unison have to be secured,” Zunger says.

Learn from our experience 

Read our practical advice about applying security fundamentals to AI.

Try it out

Read more from Zunger about applying security fundamentals to AI.

Related links

• Explore more from Zunger about how to deploy AI safely.
• Discover what you need to know about governing autonomous agents.
• Learn about aligning user, developer role, and organizational intent in agent governance.
• Find out how to use Authorization Fabric to govern AI agents at scale.
• Read about agent abuse patterns.
• Identify ways to secure AI agents with Azure AI Foundry.
• Explore how Data Security Posture Management for AI can prevent runtime risks.

We’d like to hear from you!

• Want more information? Email us and include a link to this story and we’ll get back to you.

The post Microsoft CISO advice: Apply engineering fundamentals to securing AI appeared first on Inside Track Blog.