Trace Id is missing

Sustainability reporting: driving change for a more sustainable world

Keep reading to learn how sustainability reporting standards help organizations share their environmental impact and performance with stakeholders and the public, improve operational performance and progress, and contribute to the development of a more sustainable future.
 

What are sustainability reporting standards?

Sustainability reporting standards provide a framework for measuring, managing, and disclosing the overall impact of an organization's environmental, social, and economic activities on the planet. These standards are designed to assist organizations in meeting global sustainability objectives such as improved operational transparency and accountability, enhanced sustainability performance measures, and stronger governance structures.

Additionally, sustainability reporting standards can help organizations identify areas for improvement in their operations, reduce their carbon footprint, manage risk more effectively, create shared value with stakeholders, and bolster their reputation with employees, customers, investors, and the public. 

Examples of sustainability reporting standards and frameworks include the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainable Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Each reporting standard provides different sets of criteria regarding environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives, such as:

  •  Climate change mitigation strategies
  • Management of natural resources
  • Labor practices
  • Human rights policies
  • Board composition and diversity initiatives
  • Product safety measures 
  • Supply chain oversight protocols

The origins of sustainability reporting standards

The sustainability reporting movement can be traced back to the 1960s in Europe and the1980s in the United States when organizations like Greenpeace began advocating for greater transparency around corporate impact on the environment. In response to increasing pressure, a number of large corporations began publicly disclosing information about their environmental performance.

The early focus of this movement was primarily on environmental performance—for example, carbon emissions, water use, and waste management. Over time, however, these reports have evolved to include broader considerations, such as social and economic issues. Largely responsible for this shift are changing attitudes towards business-driven development and increased public demand for businesses to recognize societal responsibilities.

Today, voluntary sustainability reporting is commonplace among publicly traded companies, with many organizations pursuing third-party assurance to provide further credibility for their disclosures.

Why are sustainability reporting standards important?

Sustainability reports provide crucial information about an organization’s activities related to the conservation of natural resources, pollution reduction, climate change mitigation, human rights protection, and other aspects of sustainable development. They also serve as a tool for understanding the effects of an organization’s decisions on its business operations and performance over time. 

Through sustainability reporting, companies can effectively establish targets or benchmarks against which they can be held accountable in terms of long-term performance goals—for instance, improved resource efficiency, reduced risk factors, or progress in their journey to net zero emissions.

Moreover, by producing comprehensive reports detailing their sustainability initiatives, companies can attract potential investors that prefer dealing with socially responsible, environmentally friendly enterprises. 

Finally, these standards and frameworks allow organizations to benchmark themselves against peers within their industry. This enables organizations to identify where changes in operational processes can be made to improve performance across all areas of the business.

 

 

What are the most common sustainability reporting standards?

There are several sustainability reporting standards that have become commonplace for organizations and businesses. Some of the most widely accepted standards include the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The GRI provides one of the oldest sustainability reporting frameworks. It offers guidance on topics such as human rights, labor standards, and corporate governance. Due to its complexity, the GRI is typically used by medium- and large-sized organizations. 
  • Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). The SASB was created in 2011 with a focus on the financial impacts of sustainability—in other words, how an organization's commitment to sustainable practices affects their bottom line. This standard provides 13 accounting metrics per industry that can be used to accurately report an organization's performance. 
  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO standards like 14001:2015 and 26000:2010 were developed in order to provide guidelines for environmental management systems and corporate social responsibility (CSR), respectively. These standards cover topics such as human rights, labor practices, environmental protection, product safety and quality control, and fair operating practices.

Each of these standards brings something unique and important to sustainability reporting efforts, and the most appropriate standard for a given organization depends on the organization’s specific needs. 

How to choose a sustainability reporting framework or standard

Some sustainability reporting frameworks focus on providing an overview of overall progress while others provide deeper detail into specific areas or projects. The framework or standard you choose should match your particular needs so that you can accurately report on your environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals and performance over time. 

When choosing an ESG reporting framework or standard, there are a few things you should consider: 

  1. Your organization type and size since different types of organizations have different reporting requirements.
  2. The intended target audience for your reports so that the correct information is captured and disseminated.
  3. What methodology will be used to determine materiality—that is, the process of identifying and prioritizing an organization’s most important ESG issues.
  4. The extent and intricacy of the materiality assessment.
  5. How much weight is given to stakeholder contributions.

 

 

The pros and cons of sustainability reporting

Sustainability reporting is a great way for businesses to demonstrate how they’re prioritizing ESG practices, but it also comes with some potential challenges. 

Sustainability reporting pros

With sustainability reporting, organizations can:

  • Improve business decision-making processes.
  • Enhance brand reputation.
  • Gain a competitive edge in the market. 
  • Boost operational efficiency and reduce costs.
  • Strengthen communication with external stakeholders.

Sustainability reporting cons

On the other hand, some of the potential drawbacks of sustainability reporting include:

  • Significant time and resource investments.
  • Cross-organizational collaboration and data accuracy challenges.
  • Setting unrealistic stakeholder expectations.
  • Difficulty measuring impact in certain areas.
  • Lack of a universal reporting standard.

Challenges associated with sustainability reporting standardization

Sustainability reporting is an important facet of corporate sustainability because it helps investors and stakeholders better understand the progress organizations are making on ESG initiatives. However, there are several challenges associated with standardizing sustainability reporting, including: 

  • Deciding which factors to track and report. There’s often a lack of consensus on what exactly should be included in sustainability reports. Some companies may focus on environmental issues such as carbon emissions or water usage while others measure social performance like diversity and inclusion initiatives. This makes it difficult to compare different companies in terms of overall environmental or social responsibility. 
  • Implementing consistent practices across industries. To accurately measure progress over time or benchmark against competitors, consistent methodologies would need to be used when collecting data and creating sustainability reports. Of course, not all organizations use the same method to collect and analyze data, and revising individual practices could prove labor- and resource-intensive.
  • Ensuring regulatory compliance. Universal standardization would require a large-scale oversight program to rigorously monitor and enforce compliance. This would ensure accurate reporting and prevent organizations from falsifying numbers or manipulating data sets to reflect a more favorable ESG profile than they actually have. However, it would take many years and significant resources to implement such a program.

While the concept of sustainability reporting standardization has its benefits, there are many obstacles that need to be addressed before universal protocols can be applied across all sectors.

 

 

The role of technology in sustainability reporting

Technology plays an increasingly important role in sustainability reporting. For instance, some sustainability solutions help organizations monitor, measure, and track the progress of their ESG goals accurately and efficiently.

Cloud solutions like Microsoft Cloud for Sustainability are designed to help organizations unify data intelligence, build a sustainable IT infrastructure, reduce the environmental impact of operations, and create sustainable value chains. In fact, cloud computing itself can be a sustainable technology since moving on-premises workloads to the cloud can reduce the carbon footprint of businesses by up to 98%.

Automation tools also make it easier for teams to streamline processes that are often involved in creating sustainability reports, such as sorting relevant datasets so they can be analyzed more effectively—this is especially useful when dealing with large volumes of complicated information that can take a significant amount time to sort manually.

Another tool, the Emissions Impact Dashboard, allows organizations to estimate their carbon emissions—and emissions they’ve already saved—related to using Microsoft Azure and Microsoft 365 cloud services.

Technology doesn’t only helped organizations improve reporting accuracy, but also provides tangible evidence for third-party audits—like those required by GRI frameworks—which often require proof against stated KPIs when making claims about sustainable business practices.

In short, technologies offer many advantages when it comes to sustainability reporting. Organizations can use technology to track the impact of their activities on the environment, assess opportunities across operational processes and product lifecycles, and develop actionable strategies to reduce their carbon footprint.

 

 

How to navigate and prepare for the future of sustainability reporting

As regulations change and new technologies emerge, it's essential for businesses to stay up to date with evolving sustainability reporting standards.

Keeping track of relevant legislation and government initiatives that could affect your business—as well as the progress of competitors in your industry—can help you anticipate and prepare for potential changes before they go into effect.

Another way to navigate emerging standards is through collaboration with other organizations in your sector, or even those in unrelated industries. Partnering with experts from different backgrounds can provide unique insights into market trends, technological breakthroughs, or regulatory updates that may be relevant to your organization's operations moving forward.

Finally, investing in technology solutions that automate compliance requirements is an effective way to prepare for changing sustainability reporting standards. Not only does automation save time, but it also reduces the risk of errors and oversights that could lead to costly fines down the road.

These are just a few strategies companies can use to stay on top of regulatory shifts and prepare for the future of sustainability reporting.

Learn more about the changing ESG regulatory landscape in this Let’s Talk Sustainability video series.

 

FAQs

  • Sustainability reporting standards provide a framework for measuring, managing, and disclosing the overall impact of an organization's environmental, social, and economic activities on the planet. These standards are designed to assist organizations in meeting global sustainability objectives such as improved operational transparency and accountability, enhanced sustainability performance measures, and stronger governance structures.

  • There are many sustainability reporting standards that organizations and businesses can choose to use. Some of the most widely accepted standards include the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

  • ESG frameworks are guidelines that companies use to report on their non-financial performance, particularly in the areas of environmental impact, social responsibility, and corporate governance. These frameworks provide a structure for companies to gather, analyze, and report relevant data on their ESG practices to investors, stakeholders, and the public.

  • There are numerous sustainability reporting frameworks, and since each one uses a unique methodology and focuses on measuring different factors, organizations may choose to use one or more frameworks based on their needs and goals. That said, the GRI is generally considered to be the most widely used sustainability reporting framework and is used by many of the world's largest companies.

Follow Microsoft

AI-powered assistant